AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assesses the effectiveness of various bisphosphonates in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, focusing on vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral-nonhip fractures.
  • Eight randomized placebo-controlled trials were analyzed using a Bayesian network meta-analysis, enabling comparison of treatment effects among different bisphosphonates without direct head-to-head trials.
  • Results indicate that zoledronic acid is most effective for reducing vertebral fractures, with a 79% probability of being the best option, while risedronate is particularly effective for nonvertebral-nonhip fractures.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of available bisphosphonate therapies regarding the prevention of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral-nonhip fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Methods: Eight randomized placebo controlled trials investigating the effects of zoledronic acid (1 study), alendronate (3), ibandronate (1), risedronate (2), and etidronate (1) in terms of fractures with a follow-up of 3 years (or 2 years if used for registration purposes) were identified with a systematic literature search. The endpoints of interest were morphometric vertebral fractures, hip fractures, and nonvertebral-nonhip fractures. Results of all trials were analyzed simultaneously with a Bayesian network meta-analysis by which the relative treatment effect of 1 intervention to another can be obtained in the absence of head-to-head evidence. Given the estimated treatment effects and their uncertainty, the Bayesian approach allowed for calculations of the probability of which bisphosphonate is best in terms of overall fracture reductions by weighting the impact of each by type of fracture on costs, quality of life, and incidence.

Results: There is a 79% probability that zoledronic acid shows the greatest reduction in vertebral fractures of all bisphophonates compared. Zoledronic acid showed a relative risk (RR) of 0.30 (95% Credible Interval 0.23-0.37) relative to placebo, an RR of 0.55 (0.41-0.76) relative to alendronate, an RR of 0.50 (0.36-0.70) relative to risedronate, and an RR of 0.58 (0.37-0.92) relative to ibandronate. Regarding hip fractures, there is a 47% probability that zoledronic acid shows the greatest risk reduction, followed by alendronate (36%) and risedronate (11%). RRs of zoledronic acid relative to placebo, alendronate, and risedronate were 0.58 (0.41-0.82), 0.95 (0.54-1.68), and 0.73 (0.37-1.44), respectively. Risedronate showed the greatest reduction in nonvertebral-nonhip fractures, followed by zoledronic acid. The RR of zoledronic acid relative to risedronate was 1.28 (0.87-1.90). Overall, there was a 94% probability that zoledronic acid showed the greatest reduction in any fracture. Weighting the impact of the different type of fractures by incidence, cost, or quality of life showed similar results.

Conclusion: Of the available bisphosphonates for osteoporosis, zoledronic acid has the highest probability of offering the best overall fracture protection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2010.06.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

zoledronic acid
36
nonvertebral-nonhip fractures
16
probability zoledronic
12
acid greatest
12
greatest reduction
12
acid relative
12
fractures
10
zoledronic
9
acid
9
prevention vertebral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!