Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: This national multicenter study determined the diagnostic performance of 1.5-T whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Background: Whole-heart coronary MRA using steady-state free precession allows noninvasive detection of CAD without the administration of contrast medium. However, the accuracy of this approach has not been determined in a multicenter trial.
Methods: Using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging unit, free-breathing steady-state free precession whole-heart coronary MRA images were acquired for 138 patients with suspected CAD at 7 hospitals. The accuracy of MRA for detecting a ≥ 50% reduction in diameter was determined using X-ray coronary angiography as the reference method.
Results: Acquisition of whole-heart coronary MRA images was performed in 127 (92%) of 138 patients with an average imaging time of 9.5 ± 3.5 min. The areas under the receiver-operator characteristic curve from MRA images according to vessel- and patient-based analyses were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 0.95) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.93), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of MRA according to a patient-based analysis were 88% (49 of 56, 95% CI: 75% to 94%), 72% (51 of 71, 95% CI: 60% to 82%), 71% (49 of 69, 95% CI: 59% to 81%), 88% (51 of 58, 95% CI: 76% to 95%), and 79% (100 of 127, 95% CI: 72% to 86%), respectively.
Conclusions: Non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary MRA at 1.5-T can noninvasively detect significant CAD with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. A negative predictive value of 88% indicates that whole-heart coronary MRA can rule out CAD.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.071 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!