Bicarbonate versus lactate solutions for acute peritoneal dialysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

a) Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Research Institution, School of Basic Medicine Sciences of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, China, b) Evidence-based Medicine Centre of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou City, China c) Social Work School, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

Published: September 2010

Background: The high mortality rate among critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) remains an unsolved problem in intensive care medicine, despite the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT). Increasing evidence from clinical studies in adults and children suggests that the new peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluids may allow for better long-term preservation of peritoneal morphology and function. Formation of glucose degradation products (GDPs) can be reduced and even avoided with the use of newer "biocompatible" solutions. However, it is still unclear if there are any differences in using conventional (lactate) solutions compared with low GDP (bicarbonate) solutions for acute PD.

Objectives: To look at the benefits and harms of bicarbonate versus lactate solutions in acute PD.

Search Strategy: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database LILACS (from 1982), and reference lists of articles.

Selection Criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bicarbonate to lactate solution for acute PD.

Data Collection And Analysis: Two authors independently assess the methodological quality of studies. One author abstracted data onto a standard form, and a second author checked data extraction. We used the random-effects model and expressed the results as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Main Results: We included one study (20 patients) in this review. In shock patients, bicarbonate did not differ from lactate with respect to mortality (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.06 to 3.91); however there were significant differences in blood lactate (MD -1.60 mmol/L, 95% CI -2.04 to -1.16), serum bicarbonate (MD 5.00 mmol/L, 95% CI 3.26 to 6.74) and blood pH (MD 0.12, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.18). In non-shock patients there was a significance difference in blood lactate (MD -0.60 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.35) but not in serum bicarbonate (MD 1.10 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.27 to 2.47) or blood pH (MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.06). Other outcomes could not be analysed because of the limited data available.

Authors' Conclusions: There is no strong evidence that any clinical advantage for patients requiring acute PD for AKI when comparing conventional (lactate) with low GDP dialysis solutions (bicarbonate).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007034.pub2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mmol/l 95%
16
lactate solutions
12
solutions acute
12
bicarbonate
8
bicarbonate versus
8
lactate
8
versus lactate
8
peritoneal dialysis
8
evidence clinical
8
conventional lactate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!