Previous studies have demonstrated that both anastrozole and letrozole are well tolerated. Letrozole suppresses estrogen to a greater degree than anastrozole in the serum and breast tumor. Concerns have been raised that greater potency may adversely affect patients' quality of life (QOL). One hundred eighty-one postmenopausal women with invasive estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers were randomized to receive either 12 weeks of letrozole followed by 12 weeks of anastrozole or the reverse sequence. One hundred and six received immediate adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs) following surgery, and 75 received extended adjuvant therapy. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Endocrine Subscale (FACT-B-ES) QOL questionnaires were completed to assess QOL on each drug. Additional side-effect profiles were collected. Each patient completed a patient preference form. Twenty-one patients withdrew before study end, 10/179 (5.6%) while taking letrozole and 4/173 (2.3%) while taking anastrozole (P = 0.12). Tamoxifen-naïve patients had a higher mean ES (endocrine symptoms subscale) score at entry versus those having extended therapy (66.0 vs. 61.9; P = 0.001). There was no significant change in FACT-B-ES (overall) scores or ES scores while patients were taking anastrozole or letrozole and no significant differences between drugs. Nearly 80% of patients reported one or more side effects with either agent. No differences in frequency, grade, or range of side effects were seen between drugs. Of 160 patients, 49 (30.6%) preferred letrozole, 57 (35.6%) preferred anastrozole, and 54 (33.8%) had no preference (P = 0.26, Pearson's Chi-squared test). In conclusion, both AIs are equally well tolerated. There were no significant differences in QOL scores between the two drugs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1091-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anastrozole letrozole
12
quality life
8
well tolerated
8
side effects
8
anastrozole
7
letrozole
6
patients
5
letrozole investigation
4
investigation comparison
4
comparison quality
4

Similar Publications

Real world pharmacovigilance assessment of drug related macular degeneration risks.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Xiamen University Affiliated Xiamen Eye Center, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Fujian Engineering and Research Center of Eye Regenerative Medicine, Eye Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian, China.

Macular degeneration is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss, significantly impacting quality of life. To enhance clinical practice and reduce the risk of drug-related macular degeneration, we analyzed drug-related trends using real-world data. Disproportionality analysis of adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS, 2004-2023) identified 67,683 cases involving 1402 drugs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Emerging evidence suggests potential cardiovascular toxicities from oral endocrine therapies (ETs); however, results are conflicting. This study comprehensively examined adverse reactions of ETs and investigated cardiovascular and metabolic safety signals within the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods: Reports in the FAERS through December 2023 were analyzed for documented reactions to tamoxifen, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane in female breast cancer patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Targeted and cytotoxic inhibitors used in the treatment of breast cancer.

Pharmacol Res

December 2024

Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research, 221 Haywood Knolls Drive, Hendersonville, NC 28791, United States. Electronic address:

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the fifth leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Surgery and radiation therapy are localized therapies for early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. The management of breast cancer is determined in large part by the HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), HR (hormone receptor), ER (estrogen receptor), and PR (progesterone receptor) status.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cyclin D-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, along with aromatase inhibitors and estrogen receptor degraders, are being evaluated for their effectiveness in therapeutic drug monitoring due to a lack of routine clinical methods.
  • This study assesses three sample preparation techniques: dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and phospholipid removal (PLR), for accurately measuring these drugs in patient plasma.
  • Results show that all methods are highly precise and accurate, with DLLME being the most eco-friendly, PLR allowing for high throughput, and SPE offering superior analytical performance, enabling users to choose the best method based on their needs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!