A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Correlation of bladder thickness on ultrasound with clinical and urodynamic data in symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia]. | LitMetric

Objectives: Our objective is to verify the diagnostic usefulness of ultrasound measurement of the thickness of the bladder wall, and the correlation with clinical/ urodynamic findings in patients with symptomatic BPH.

Methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study (cross-sectional study '') in a series of 74 males (age chi= 72.4 S = 7.1 (56-84 years) with symptomatic BPH. Patients completed the IPSS and determined the plasma level of PSAt (ng / ml). Before performing the urodynamic study, was determined by transabdominal ultrasonography (3.5 MHz transducer): prostate volume (cc) by the ellipsoid formula, and bladder wall thickness (mm) measured on the anterior bladder wall. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, the Pearson correlation, and ROC curve.

Results: It was a significant correlation of the sonographic thickness of the bladder wall with the IPSS (p = 0001, r = 0.38) (parameter in turn highly correlated with prostate volume and PSA (p = 0.01, r = 0.62)), as well as the detrusor hyperactivity (p = 0.03, r =0.21), cut off ROC curve: 3.85 mm. Instead, it was not shown a significant correlation between the sonographic thickness of the bladder wall and the urodynamic diagnosis of obstruction (Abrams and number Griffths p = 0223, r = 0.14) or the detrusor contractile power, measured in power at peak flow (Pw) (p = 0642 r =- 0.55), nor with age (p = 0303, r = 0.12). Neither correlation was observed with other non-invasive urodynamic measures (the maximum urinary flow flowmetry (p = 0318, r = 0.12) and percentage postmicturition residual (p = 0696, r = 0.05)).

Conclusions: The ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness, although it has not proved useful ness in our series in the diagnosis of the voiding phase (lower urinary tract obstruction and detrusor contractility impairment), on the contrary it can be introduced as a diagnostic technique for non-invasive studies in the alterations of the filling phase, in the form of detrusor hyperactivity in also patients with symptomatic BPH, and present a significant correlation with prostate growth.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0004-06142010000600005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bladder wall
24
thickness bladder
12
ultrasound measurement
8
patients symptomatic
8
cross-sectional study
8
symptomatic bph
8
prostate volume
8
wall thickness
8
correlation sonographic
8
sonographic thickness
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!