A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intraoperative comparison of knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee and contralateral stable knee using navigation system. | LitMetric

Purpose: The objective of this study was to compare knee laxity between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-reconstructed knees and contralateral stable knees by use of intraoperative navigation.

Methods: Five patients with ipsilateral ACL-deficient knees with contralateral stable knees without any ligament injuries were included in this study. Anteroposterior (AP) knee laxity during anterior drawer force applied manually and range of tibial rotation and AP knee laxity during internal and external rotational torque applied manually in both the ACL-deficient knee and the contralateral stable knee were measured by use of a navigation system from 15 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. After the temporary fixation of the posterolateral bundle, anteromedial bundle (AMB), or double-bundle (DB) reconstruction, knee laxity was measured again and compared with that of the stable knee.

Results: The mean laxities for PLB reconstruction were significantly greater than those of the contralateral stable knee at more than 75 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05). The mean laxities for AMB or DB reconstruction were not significantly different from those of the contralateral stable knee at all knee flexion angles. Those for AMB reconstruction were within +1.6 mm and those for DB reconstruction were within -2.0 mm of those of the contralateral stable knee. The mean rotations for all reconstructions were significantly less than those of the contralateral stable knee at less than 30 degrees of knee flexion (P < .05).

Conclusions: DB and AMB reconstructions could restore knee laxity closer to the level of the contralateral stable knee. Because normal knee laxity is different in each individual, evaluation of contralateral stable knee laxity during ACL reconstruction surgery would be helpful for restoration to the level of the specific preinjury knee laxity.

Level Of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2010.01.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contralateral stable
40
knee laxity
32
stable knee
32
knee
22
knee flexion
16
laxity anterior
12
degrees knee
12
stable
11
contralateral
10
laxity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!