Traditionally, it has been difficult to compare the clinical performance of carbide dental burs. The purpose of this laboratory study was to investigate the comparative cutting efficiency of number 330 dental burs from six manufacturers. These burs were tested utilizing custom-built equipment consisting of a frictionless air sled to which the Macor substrate was attached. The substrate was fed to the bur at constant pressure. The efficiency of each bur, defined as the distance of the cut divided by the time taken, then was calculated. Of the six bur types tested, only one was found to be markedly superior, and four types were comparable in performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dental burs
12
carbide dental
8
macor substrate
8
comparative efficiency
4
efficiency testing
4
testing 330
4
330 carbide
4
burs
4
burs utilizing
4
utilizing macor
4

Similar Publications

3-Dimensional topographic enamel surface changes after different debonding techniques for aligner attachments: a micro-CT study.

Clin Oral Investig

January 2025

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics , Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.

Introduction: To evaluate topographic changes of enamel surface in 3-dimensional after different debonding methods of aligner attachments formed with 2 different composite resins.

Methods: Vertical rectangular attachments were created on 88 premolar teeth and divided into two composite resin groups (Group 1:flowable, Group 2:packable) (N = 44). These were then divided into two subgroups (N = 22) using different debonding methods.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Clinical characteristics and removal of broken burs retained in the lower jaw.

BMC Oral Health

January 2025

State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Background: A broken bur retained in the lower jaw is an uncommon complication that occurs during the extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of the broken burs and review our experience with the removal of the broken burs in these cases.

Methods: All patients, who suffered the broken bur remained in the lower jaw due to the extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar and presented to our hospital from July 2019 to July 2024, were included in this retrospective study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Smart burs and chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) systems are alternative techniques for cavity preparation, but existing studies show mixed results regarding their efficacy, efficiency, and patient comfort.
  • This systematic review analyzed in vivo studies comparing these methods, excluding lower-quality sources and conducting a thorough risk of bias assessment on the included studies.
  • The analysis revealed that, although 154 studies were initially reviewed, only a few were suitable for meta-analysis, showing no significant difference in clinical efficacy between CMCR systems and smart burs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of universal cements (UCs) to dentin prepared with different diamond burs using various adhesive strategies.

Materials And Methods: One-hundred-twenty molars were prepared to expose the mid-coronal dentin. The teeth were divided into two groups according to diamond bur preparations: coarse and super-fine grit burs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!