Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures.

AJR Am J Roentgenol

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, White Bldg. 270C, 55 Fruit St., Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Published: September 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines how a radiologist pay-for-performance program impacts turnaround times for finalized radiologist reports, a key quality care metric in medicine.
  • Over the study, RTAT (from examination completion to final signature) improved significantly during the period the program was active, with the most notable improvement seen in the component measuring time from preliminary to final signature.
  • Even after the program ended, the positive effects on report turnaround times persisted, suggesting lasting benefits of the PFP initiative.

Article Abstract

Objective: Expedited finalized radiologist report turnaround times (RTAT) are considered an important quality care metric in medicine. This study was performed to evaluate the impact of a radiologist pay-for-performance (PFP) program on reducing RTAT.

Materials And Methods: A radiologist PFP program was used to assess its impact on RTAT for all departmental reports from 11 subspecialty divisions. Study periods were 3 months before (baseline period) and immediately after (immediate period) the introduction of the program and 2 years later after the program had terminated (post period). Three RTAT components were evaluated for individual radiologists and for each radiology division: examination completion (C) to final signature (F), C to preliminary signature (P), and P to F.

Results: Eighty-one radiologists met the inclusion criterion for the study and performed a final signature on 99,959 reports during the baseline period, 104,673 reports during the immediate period, and 91,379 reports during the post period. Mean C-F, C-P, and P-F for all reports decreased significantly from baseline to immediate to post period (p < 0.0001), with the largest effect on the P-F component. Similarly, divisional C-F, C-P, and P-F also significantly decreased (p < 0.0001) for all divisions except the C-F for nuclear and neurovascular radiology from baseline to immediate period and the C-P component from baseline to post period for cardiac radiology.

Conclusion: A radiologist PFP program appears to have a marked effect on expediting final report turnaround times, which continues after its termination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.4164DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post period
16
report turnaround
12
pfp program
12
baseline period
12
period
9
radiologist report
8
turnaround times
8
study performed
8
radiologist pfp
8
final signature
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!