Background: Driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) is one of the main causes of car accidents. Alcohol and marijuana are the most popular drugs among recreational users. Many classify these drugs as "Light" drugs and therefore allow themselves to drive after consuming them.
Objective: The study had two main objectives: 1) to investigate the effect of alcohol (BAC=0.05%), THC (13 mg) and their combination on driving and non-driving tasks. 2) to investigate the extent to which people are willing to drive based on their subjective sensations and their perceived effects of the drugs.
Method: 7 healthy men and 5 healthy women, ages 24-29, all recreational users of alcohol and marijuana, completed 5 experimental sessions. Sessions included: drinking and smoking placebo, drinking alcohol and smoking placebo, drinking placebo and smoking THC, drinking alcohol and smoking THC, drinking placebo and smoking placebo 24 hours after drinking alcohol and smoking THC. Three types of measures were used: subjective perceptions (with questionnaires), performance parameters of the driving and non-driving tasks (arithmetic task and a secondary target detection task) and physiological changes (heart rate).
Results: Overall, the combination of alcohol and THC had the most intense effect after intake. This effect was reflected in performance impairments observed in the driving and non-driving tasks, in the subjective sensations after intake, and in the physiological measures. Despite significant differences in the size of the effects after the various treatments, there were no differences in the distances subjects were willing to drive while under the influence on each of the treatments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.006 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Objective: This study explores the effectiveness of conversational prompts on enhancing driver monitoring behavior and takeover performance in partially automated driving under two non-driving-related task (NDRT) scenarios with varying workloads.
Background: Driver disengagement in partially automated driving is a serious safety concern. Intermittent conversational prompts that require responses may be a solution.
Using a visual attentional task and eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover resource engagement on attention restoration in conditionally automated driving.
Traffic Inj Prev
January 2025
National Key Laboratory of Human Factors Engineering, China Astronaut Research and Training Centre, Beijing, China.
Objective: Attention forms the foundation for the formation of situation awareness. Low situation awareness can lead to driving performance decline, which can be dangerous in driving. The goal of this study is to investigate how different types of pre-takeover tasks, involving cognitive, visual and physical resources engagement, as well as individual attentional function, affect driver's attention restoration in conditionally automated driving.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAustralian occupational therapists' perspectives about the management of driving safety concerns for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment.
Aust Occup Ther J
February 2025
Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Introduction: Driving safety may be compromised in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Occupational therapists assess and screen for driving safety in older people with cognitive impairment. However, little is known about their perspectives relating to these assessments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInternal Factors that Influence Coping in Older Drivers' Transition to Non-Driving.
J Appl Gerontol
December 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how internal factors, particularly attitudes towards mobility, affect changes in transportation behavior among older drivers (70+) transitioning away from driving.
- It found that older individuals with a high readiness to adapt to mobility changes are significantly more likely to use alternative forms of transportation over time.
- However, personality traits had no impact on driving behavior or the use of alternative transportation, suggesting that attitudes play a crucial role in coping with reduced driving.
How difficult is it perceived to takeover in a level 3 automated vehicle? Investigation of the ease of use according to task and situational factors.
Ergonomics
December 2024
Cognition, Languages, Language and Ergonomics (CLLE) Laboratory, University of Toulouse - Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France.
One goal of automated driving is to mitigate risks by minimising human intervention. However, widespread acceptance of automated vehicles hinges on their perceived ease of use, particularly during takeover scenarios. This online survey investigates the perceived difficulty of takeover in Level 3 Automated Vehicles, focusing on factors influencing takeover performance such as duration of automated mode and traffic density, as well as Non-Driving-Related Tasks like listening to music or engaging in conversation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!