Objectives: The aim of this article is to compare different mini-incision donor nephrectomy techniques in the literature.
Materials And Methods: We did a literature search using PUBMED using the search term "donor nephrectomy." We compared different surgical techniques using different parameters like length of incision, length of operation, pain medications required after the operation, site of the operation, and intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Results: We found 7 different surgical techniques of mini-invasive donor nephrectomy. Hakim and associates described the smallest initial incision size of 4 cm. There also are limited data on the analgesia requirements in 4 of the series, and 3 series that describe the requirements vary.
Conclusions: These techniques offer advantages and disadvantages to the donor and the kidney. We hope to encourage further work. Ideally, there must be a working discussion, long-term outcomes of donor kidney and recipient, as well as accurate pain records, both quantitative and qualitative, and a discussion of time to mobilization.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Association between intraoperative fluid management and postoperative outcomes in living kidney donors: a retrospective cohort study.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Optimal fluid strategy for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) remains unclear. LDN has been a domain for liberal fluid management to ensure graft perfusion, but this can result in adverse outcomes due to fluid overload. We compared postoperative outcome of living kidney donors according to the intraoperative fluid management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is often performed using hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). Adherent perinephric fat (APF) can complicate HALDN, increasing operative time. The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score predicts APF preoperatively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Impact of Learning Curve on Robotic Living Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes: Retrospective Analysis.
Int J Med Robot
February 2025
Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Background: We aimed to investigate the outcome of patients after RDN at different time points.
Methods: We studied the outcomes of 77 living robotic living donor nephrectomies (RDN). Donors were separated into three groups: learning curve period (LCP), stabilisation period (SP), and teaching period (TP).
YAU kidney transplantation spotlight: should the robotic surgery be considered the "standard of care" for living donor nephrectomy?
Minerva Urol Nephrol
December 2024
Unit of Uro-Oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
The utility of split function testing in determining recovery of glomerular filtration rate after living kidney donation: a cohort study.
BMC Nephrol
January 2025
Glasgow Renal & Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, Scotland.
Background: A number of UK transplantation centres use isotope studies to estimate the relative contribution from each kidney in living kidney donor assessment. The evidence that the estimation of pre-donation split function of the non-donated kidney influences post-donation renal recovery is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse whether, in the context of other donor factors, the split function of the non-donated kidney predicts the percentage recovery of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at one-year post-donation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!