Sunitinib is associated with a robust objective response rate in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The primary objective of this phase II clinical trial was to assess the overall response rate for sunitinib in patients with papillary metastatic RCC as well as other non-clear cell histologies. A Simon 2-stage design was used to determine the number of papillary metastatic RCC patients for enrollment, and allowed for descriptive response data for other non-clear cell histologies. Twenty-three patients were enrolled, including 8 with papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and the remainder with other non-clear cell histologies (unclassified in 5 patients). All patients received 50 mg of oral sunitinib in cycles of 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (4/2). The trial was stopped early because of slow accrual; no responses were observed in the 8 patients with papillary RCC. In the 22 evaluable patients, best response to sunitinib included a partial response in 1 patient with unclassified RCC, stable disease in 15, and progression in 6. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.5-7.1) in all 23 patients, and 5.6 months for the 8 papillary patients (95% CI, 1.4-7.1). The robust objective responses sunitinib had produced in clear cell RCC could not be demonstrated in this study comprised of patients with non-clear cell histologies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257373PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10637-010-9491-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-clear cell
20
cell histologies
16
patients
12
renal cell
12
cell carcinoma
12
cell
10
sunitinib patients
8
patients metastatic
8
cell renal
8
robust objective
8

Similar Publications

Objective: There are variations in prognosis and therapeutic approach for renal cell carcinoma among different histological subtypes. This study aims to determine the relationship between radiologically detected peritumoral neovascularization and the histological subtypes of Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) and to assess whether extratumoral neovascularization characteristics detected via imaging can contribute to distinguishing these subtypes alongside tumor size and T-stage.

Materials And Methods: 104 renal tumors from 104 cases consisting of 31 females (29.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a heterogeneous group of malignancies with substantial differences in morphology, genetic profiles, clinical behavior, and prognosis. Optimal treatment for nccRCC remains unclear, largely extrapolated from evidence available for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of current mainstream drug treatments for nccRCC to provide clinical treatment guidance for advanced cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of avelumab + axitinib in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, information is limited regarding the activity of avelumab + axitinib in patients with non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC). In Japan, post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of patients with RCC receiving avelumab + axitinib treatment in general clinical practice was undertaken.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is primarily treated through surgical options like radical or partial nephrectomy, and treatment decisions are based on histological classifications and the RENAL score, with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) being a safer alternative to traditional imaging methods.
  • A retrospective study at Lanzhou University Second Hospital evaluated how CEUS can help in preoperatively assessing RCC histological classifications and RENAL scores by analyzing tumor features in 248 patients undergoing surgery.
  • Findings revealed that certain imaging features (hyperenhancement, heterogeneous enhancement, etc.) were significant indicators of clear cell RCC (ccRCC), suggesting CEUS has diagnostic efficacy comparable to contrast-enhanced CT in differentiating between cc
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma narrative review: where we are in 2024.

Transl Cancer Res

November 2024

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Advances in understanding non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have improved due to better molecular and genetic testing, helping to identify specific subtypes and personalize treatment.
  • Representation in clinical trials for rare non-papillary RCC variants is limited, making evidence-based management difficult.
  • The shift toward molecular diagnostics is enhancing our knowledge of RCC behaviors and responses to treatments, although most evidence comes from smaller clinical studies rather than extensive trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!