A group of 32 patients with a histological diagnosis of prostate cancer underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to stage the disease. TRUS was more sensitive in the detection of tumour and in the detection of direct extracapsular spread. MRI was more sensitive in the detection of tumour involvement of the seminal vesicles and bladder base. MRI allowed the detection of lymphadenopathy and bone metastases in the lumbosacral spine and pelvis. During MRI the short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence was found to be particularly useful for the detection of tumour spread. TRUS and MRI are complementary investigations and for the accurate staging of prostatic malignancy both investigations should be used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15226.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

detection tumour
12
transrectal ultrasound
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8
prostate cancer
8
sensitive detection
8
mri
5
detection
5
comparison transrectal
4
ultrasound magnetic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!