Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 144
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 144
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 212
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3106
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In order to determine if its magnetic topology is actually two- or three-dimensional (2D or 3D), the mechanism of the magnetic interaction in (5MAP)(2)CuBr(4), a previously thought quasi-2D antiferromagnet, is re-examined using the first-principles bottom-up methodology. Once the magnitude and sign of all unique magnetic interactions present in the room-temperature (5MAP)(2)CuBr(4) crystal are evaluated, it is found that, even at room temperature, the magnetic topology of the crystal corresponds to a 3D antiferromagnet. Such 3D nature cannot be determined by examination of the magnetic susceptibility curve, chi(T), because it is found that the chi(T) curve computed using this 3D magnetic topology is very similar to that obtained using a 2D model where all interplane interactions have been deleted. However, its 3D magnetic dimensionality can be confirmed by examination of the shape of the magnetization curve, M(H); the computed curve is similar to the experimental one for the 3D case.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic101023b | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!