A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prognostic factors in penile cancer. | LitMetric

Prognostic factors in penile cancer.

Urology

Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, Urology Clinic, University of Padua Monoblocco Ospedaliero, Via Giustiniani 2, Padua, Italy.

Published: August 2010

Objectives: To review the published data concerning the prognostic factors in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using the MEDLINE databases. Multiple "free text" searches were performed, searching for the following terms individually in the fields title and abstract of the records: "squamous cell carcinoma," "penile cancer" and "prognostic factors." The search included all studies published in English until November 2008. All selected reports were classified according to the level of evidence (LE). The final grade of recommendation (GR) was determined by discussion among all panel members of the International Consultation on Penile Cancer in November 2008.

Results: The presence of metastases in the regional lymph nodes is the main factor predicting an unfavorable prognosis for patients with penile SCC (LE 3, GR B). The prognosis varies according to the number of positive lymph nodes, the presence of uni- or bilateral inguinal extension, pelvic node involvement, and the presence of lymph node capsular involvement (LE 3, GR B). The histologic subtype, pathologic extension, histologic grade, and lymphatic and/or venous embolization are the most important variables of the primary tumor predicting for inguinal lymph node involvement (LE 3, GR B).

Conclusions: The use of nomograms will allow for improvements in prognostic accuracy compared with the use of each single variable (LE 3, GR B). The use of molecular prognostic factors in clinical practice awaits additional confirmatory investigation (LE 3, GR B).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.04.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prognostic factors
12
penile cancer
8
patients penile
8
lymph nodes
8
node involvement
8
lymph node
8
prognostic
4
penile
4
factors penile
4
cancer objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!