Experiences of immigrant women who self-petition under the Violence Against Women Act.

Violence Against Women

Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, 2495 N. Martin, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.

Published: August 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • Undocumented immigrant women facing abuse in the U.S. often feel trapped due to fear of deportation and dependence on their partners for legal status.
  • The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA, 1994) allows these women to self-petition for legal status, helping them escape abusive situations.
  • A study used qualitative research to explore the challenges Mexican immigrant women encounter when filing VAWA self-petitions, highlighting emotional, financial, and logistical barriers and suggesting improvements for policy and practice.

Article Abstract

Undocumented immigrant women who are abused and living in the United States are isolated in a foreign country, in constant fear of deportation, and feel at the mercy of their spouse to gain legal status. To ensure that immigration law does not trap women in abusive relationships, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA, 1994) enabled immigrant women to self-petition for legal status. Qualitative research methods were used in this participatory action research to investigate the experiences of Mexican immigrant women filing VAWA self-petitions. Emotional, financial, and logistic barriers in applying are identified, and recommendations for practice research and policy are provided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801210376889DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immigrant women
16
women self-petition
8
violence women
8
legal status
8
women
7
experiences immigrant
4
self-petition violence
4
women undocumented
4
undocumented immigrant
4
women abused
4

Similar Publications

The discipline of ecology and evolutionary biology (EEB) has long grappled with issues of inclusivity and representation, particularly for individuals with systematically excluded and marginalized backgrounds or identities. For example, significant representation disparities still persist that disproportionately affect women and gender minorities; Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC); individuals with disabilities; and people who are LGBTQIA+. Recent calls for action have urged the EEB community to directly address issues of representation, inclusion, justice, and equity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Immigrant Background and Rape Conviction: A 21-Year Follow-Up Study in Sweden.

J Interpers Violence

January 2025

Center for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.

While extensive research exists on the severe consequences among rape victims, little is known about specific predictors in relation to rape convictions among immigrants to Europe. This study from Sweden (having one of Europe's highest per capita rates of rape) investigates individuals convicted of rape, aggravated rape, attempted rape, or attempted aggravated rape, collectively termed as rape+, against women 18 years or older, from 2000 to 2020. In this case-control study, we analyzed data from Swedish population-based registers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: In Germany, 0.25% of the total population are persons with a Vietnamese migration background. There are almost no studies on this particular group of immigrants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Measles remains a public health concern, particularly among populations with suboptimal vaccination coverage, including immigrants. Understanding the seroprevalence of measles antibodies in immigrant populations is essential to inform tailored vaccination strategies and reduce the risk of measles reintroduction.

Methods: This study evaluated measles IgG seroprevalence among 651 immigrants from 30 countries residing in Gwangju, South Korea.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to identify demographic, acculturation, and health care factors associated with self-reported knowledge of the right to medical interpretation among individuals with non-English language preference (NELP) in California.

Background: NELP is a significant social determinant of health contributing to adverse health outcomes through barriers in communication, limited health literacy, and biases in care delivery. The ability of patients with NELP to self-advocate for interpreter services is crucial yet hindered by various factors, including a lack of knowledge about their rights.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!