Like other complex, multifaceted interventions in medicine, meditation represents a mixture of specific and not-so-specific elements of therapy. However, meditation is somewhat unique in that it is difficult to standardize, quantify, and authenticate for a given sample of research subjects. Thus, it is often challenging to discern its specific effects in order to satisfy the scientific method of causal inferences that underlies evidence-based medicine. Therefore, it is important to consider the key methodological challenges that affect both the design and analysis of meditation research. The goal of this paper is to review those challenges and to offer some practical solutions. Among the challenges discussed are the mismatches between questions and designs, the variability in meditation types, problems associated with meditation implementation, individual differences across meditators, and the impossibility of double-blind, placebo-controlled meditation studies. Among the design solutions offered are aptitude x treatment interaction (ATI) research, mixed quantitative-qualitative methods, and practical (pragmatic) clinical trials. Similar issues and solutions can be applied more generally to the entire domain of mind-body therapies.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methodological challenges
8
meditation
7
challenges meditation
4
meditation complex
4
complex multifaceted
4
multifaceted interventions
4
interventions medicine
4
medicine meditation
4
meditation represents
4
represents mixture
4

Similar Publications

Background: The integration of real-world evidence (RWE) from real-world data (RWD) in clinical research is crucial for bridging the gap between clinical trial results and real-world outcomes. Analyzing routinely collected data to generate clinical evidence faces methodological concerns like confounding and bias, similar to prospectively documented observational studies. This study focuses on additional limitations frequently reported in the literature, providing an overview of the challenges and biases inherent to analyzing routine clinical care data, including health claims data (hereafter: routine data).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The experimental methods employed during metagenomic sequencing analyses of microbiome samples significantly impact the resulting data and typically vary substantially between laboratories. In this study, a full factorial experimental design was used to compare the effects of a select set of methodological choices (sample, operator, lot, extraction kit, variable region, and reference database) on the analysis of biologically diverse stool samples. For each parameter investigated, a main effect was calculated that allowed direct comparison both between methodological choices (bias effects) and between samples (real biological differences).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

KSA is transforming its healthcare system by developing and implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), a tool designed to improve patient outcomes, standardize care, and facilitate evidence-based decision-making. CPGs are crucial in addressing healthcare disparities, thereby promoting health equity and patient experience. They are integral to KSA's healthcare transformation agenda.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Aging in rural areas is challenging and has very specific characteristics in the way these elderly people live their old age, from the perspectives of cognition, functionality and life purpose. There is a lack of information and data in the literature on how people age in rural areas around the world. The aim of this study was to identify and describe how people age in rural areas, focusing on the following domains: cognition, physical function/functionality and life purpose.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the validity and applicability of RCTs comparing minimally invasive and open surgeries for oesophageal cancer from January 2012 to June 2023.
  • Only nine RCTs were found, with just one deemed pragmatic due to narrow eligibility criteria and single-centre designs limiting the generalizability of results.
  • Recommendations include developing clearer guidelines for defining pragmatic trials to potentially enhance the applicability of future surgical RCTs in clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!