Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Virtual patients (VPs), high-fidelity simulators and standardized patients are powerful educational interventions leading to effective learning and supporting knowledge retention.
Aim: This study explored the variations in retention with VP versus regular learning activities.
Method: We conducted a randomized controlled study on early and delayed assessment results of 49 students using VP for learning and examination of haematology and cardiology topics in an Internal Medicine course, by means of a 0-10 scoring rubric.
Results: The mean difference for early assessment with VP (study--control mean score) was 1.43 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96, 1.91; p<0.001) for haematology and 1.34 (95% CI 0.93, 1.76; p<0.001) for cardiology. In regular exams, the mean score difference was 2.21 (95% CI 1.3, 3.1; p<0.001) and 1.52 (95% CI 0.76, 2.28; p<0.001), respectively. With delayed assessments, the difference in mean score for Web-SP was 1.48 (95% CI 1.09, 1.86; p<0.001), haematology and 1.16 (95% CI 0.74, 1.58; p<0.001), cardiology; for regular exams the figures were 1.96 (95% CI 0.93, 2.98; p<0.001) and 1.74 (95% CI 0.89, 2.58; p<0.001). The effect size ranged from 0.5 to 0.8.
Conclusion: Our results indicate better retention with VP than with traditional learning methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01421590903514630 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!