In this paper, we consider two complementary cost functions for the landscape exploring processes to obtain the global optimum sequence through in vitro evolution protocol: one is the entropic cost C(etp), which is based on the deviation from the uniformity of a mutant distribution in sequence space, and the other is the energetic cost C(eng), which is based on the total number of sequences to be generated and evaluated. Based on a prior knowledge about the structure of a given fitness landscapes, the conductor of the experiment can think up the efficient search algorithm (ESA), which requires the minimum number of points (=sequences) to be searched up to the global optimum. For five typical fitness landscapes, we considered their respective (putative) ESA, C(etp)(*) and C(eng)(*) based on the ESA. As a result, we found a trade-off relationship between C(etp)(*) and C(eng)(*) for every case, that is, C(eng)(*)+C(etp)(*) is approximately equal to the logarithm of the volume of the sequence space. C(etp)(*) and C(eng)(*) are interpreted in terms of the information-theoretic concepts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.07.003 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!