Sublingual allergoid immunotherapy: a new 4-day induction phase in patients allergic to house dust mites.

Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol

Respiratory Disease Centre, Papardo Hospital, Messina, Italy.

Published: August 2010

Sublingual immunotherapy with monomeric allergoid (allergoid SLIT), given according to the standard scheme, has proved effective and safe in many clinical trials. However, its build-up phase requires a long time ranging from 16 days to 14 weeks. This study therefore investigated whether, with a four-day up-dosing, the same benefit could be achieved in a shorter time. Thirty rhinitic and/or asthmatic patients (16 M and 14 F, mean age 36+/-8.2 years) allergic to house dust mites (HDM) with or without other sensitizations were randomized to allergoid SLIT or standard drug therapy. The build-up phase lasted four days. The first day the patients took a 300 AU tablet, the second day two 300 AU tablets, the third day three 300 AU tablets and the fourth day four 300 AU tablets. The total amount taken during the up-dosing was 3000 AU. Patients were then treated for 12 months at the dosage of 2000 AU/week (total amount of allergen: 104,000 AU/year). The symptom score and drug consumption were recorded from November to February on monthly diary cards. At baseline and after 12 months a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to rate the patients? well-being. Skin prick test reactivity was evaluated before and after the 12-month treatment in both groups using 10 mg/mL histamine as reference. VAS scores rose significantly (about 45%) in both groups in comparison to baseline (p=0.001). In addition, there was a significantly greater reduction of the global symptoms score (about 52%) - but not in drug consumption - in the SLIT group in comparison to controls (p=0.0004). The SLIT group showed a highly significant reduction (about 39%) in skin prick test reactivity (p=0.000003) while the control group remained unchanged (p=0.5226). No severe adverse events were observed. Even with this short four-day up-dosing, the allergoid SLIT proves to be safe. In addition, it is already effective in patients allergic to HDM after 12 months, and significantly reduces allergen-specific skin reactivity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/039463201002300217DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

allergoid slit
12
300 tablets
12
patients allergic
8
allergic house
8
house dust
8
dust mites
8
slit standard
8
build-up phase
8
four-day up-dosing
8
day 300
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study looked at how safe allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is in real-life situations by keeping track of any negative reactions people had.
  • They found that out of 1,545 adults getting AIT for allergies, only a small number (about 7.4%) experienced adverse events, and serious reactions were very rare.
  • Having asthma and using a certain type of AIT called subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) put some people at a higher risk of side effects, while using modified allergens seemed to help reduce the risk.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Allergen-specific immunotherapy uses a sublingual (sublingual immunotherapy [SLIT]) or subcutaneous (subcutaneous immunotherapy [SCIT]) route. This pharmacovigilance study aimed to determine the number and type of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for SLIT and SCIT using carbamylated monomeric allergoids (CMAs) in children. This pharmacovigilance study analyzed real-world post-marketing reports collected from a safety database of Lais sublingual tablets and injective Lais-in, containing CMAs for over 10 years.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Both subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are effective clinically against allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma, and modify the underlying immunologic abnormalities. Despite this, many patients who could benefit from receiving SCIT and SLIT do not because of concerns about safety and the inconvenience in receiving SCIT, and the long duration of treatment with both, 3-4 years being required for lasting benefit. Attempts to improve the efficacy and safety, and to shorten the course of allergen immunotherapy have taken many approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Few studies have been conducted on the short-term response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT).

Objective: The purpose of our experimental trial was to evaluate if two markers such as nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and nasal cytology could be useful to identify a precocious clinical efficacy of SLIT treatment.

Methods: We enrolled 34 children aged 6 to 14 years old with diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR) and documented sensitization towards house dust mites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Immunotherapy of allergies: current status].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz

November 2020

Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Paul-Ehrlich-Str. 51-59, 63225, Langen, Deutschland.

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causally effective, disease-modifying form of therapy that, in addition to alleviating allergic symptoms, counteracts disease progression.This article provides an up-to-date overview of immunological, regulatory and practical aspects of AIT. Current literature was included and recent conceptual regulatory developments from the Division of Allergology at the higher federal authority (Paul-Ehrlich-Institut) are presented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!