A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese Brazilian women. | LitMetric

Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese Brazilian women.

Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol

Divisão de Metabolismo e Nutrição, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Published: June 2010

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare skinfold thickness (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) of body composition using three different equations against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in overweight and obese Brazilian women.

Subjects And Method: Thirty-four women (age 43.8 +/- 10.9 years; body mass index [BMI] 32.1 +/- 4.3 kg/m(2)) had percentage body fat (BF%), fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) estimated by DXA, SKF and BIA (BIA-man: manufacturer's equation; and predictive obesity-specific equations of Segal and of Gray). Regression analysis, Bland-Altman plot analysis and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to compare methods.

Results: Absolute agreement between DXA and BIA-man was poor for all measures of body composition (BF% -6.8% +/- 3.7%, FM -3.1 +/- 3.6 kg, FFM 5.7 +/- 2.8 kg). BIA-Segal equation showed good absolute agreement with DXA for BF% (1.5% +/- 1.5%), FM (1.0 +/- 3.2 kg) and FFM (1.5 +/- 2.6 kg), albeit the limits of agreement were wide. BIA-Gray equation showed good absolute agreement with DXA for FM (2.3 +/- 4.1 kg), and smaller biases for BF% (0.05% +/- 4.4%) and FFM (0.2 +/- 2.9 kg), although wide limits of agreement. BIA-Gray and DXA showed the highest ICC among the pairs of methods. A good absolute agreement was observed between DXA and SKF for BF% (-2.3% +/- 5.8%), FM (0.09 +/- 4.7 kg), and FFM (2.4 +/- 4.4 kg), although limits of agreement were wider and ICC between DXA and SKF for BF% indicated poor degree of reproducibility.

Conclusion: These findings show that both BIA-Segal and BIA-Gray equations are suitable for BF%, FM and FFM estimations in overweight and obese women.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0004-27302010000400009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

absolute agreement
16
ffm +/-
16
+/-
14
body composition
12
overweight obese
12
dxa skf
12
agreement dxa
12
+/- ffm
12
good absolute
12
limits agreement
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!