Boden and Ozonoff's undercount estimates in their recent Commentary rely on three assumptions for which no quantitative literature references are provided. Alternatively, we show that findings in both studies and published data indicate lower upper-bound estimates for the undercount range. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:854-855, 2010. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20840DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data harmonization--a
4
harmonization--a response
4
response boden
4
boden ozonoff
4
ozonoff boden
4
boden ozonoff's
4
ozonoff's undercount
4
undercount estimates
4
estimates commentary
4
commentary rely
4

Similar Publications

Boden and Ozonoff's undercount estimates in their recent Commentary rely on three assumptions for which no quantitative literature references are provided. Alternatively, we show that findings in both studies and published data indicate lower upper-bound estimates for the undercount range. Am.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!