A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effect of electroacupuncture on the healing process of tibia fracture in a rat model: a randomised controlled trial. | LitMetric

Background: Electrical stimulation is used to promote bone reunion, and is most effective when applied directly to the fracture site.

Objective: To examine the effects of electroacupuncture (EA) on the healing process of tibia fracture in a rat model.

Methods: Thirty 12-week-old male Wistar rats underwent unilateral open osteotomies of the tibiae. The rats were then assigned randomly to three groups: EA group (n=10), sham group (n=10) and control group (n=10). In the EA group, a cathodal electrode was connected to an acupuncture needle percutaneously penetrated directly at the surgery site, while an acupuncture needle inserted at 15 mm proximal to the surgery site was used as an anodal electrode. EA (50 Hz, 20 μA, 20 min) was performed daily for 3 weeks. In the sham group the acupuncture needles were inserted at the same sites but no electrical stimulation was given and in the control group, no treatment was given. The response was evaluated at 1, 3, 4 and 6 weeks after surgery by radiographic, macroscopic and mechanical examinations.

Results: The EA group showed accelerated bone healing (EA group 29.92+/-4.55 mm², sham group 26.46+/-5.21 mm², control group 26.19+/-2.81 mm², p<0.05 at 3 weeks) and accretion of the callus (radiographic evaluation: EA group 35.66+/-4.37 mm², sham group 32.60+/-5.73 mm², control group 29.72+/-6.39 mm², p<0.05 at 6 weeks) compared with the other groups. Mechanical testing also showed an excellent result (EA group 16.54+/-9.92 N, sham group 7.13+/-3.57 N, control group 6.67+/-3.12 N, p<0.05) at 6 weeks in the EA group compared with the other groups. There was no difference between the sham and control groups in any evaluation.

Conclusion: The use of EA enhanced callus development and bone mineralisation during the bone healing process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/aim.2009.001800DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

group n=10
12
sham group
12
control group
12
group
10
electroacupuncture healing
8
healing process
8
process tibia
8
tibia fracture
8
fracture rat
8
electrical stimulation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!