Background And Objective: To assess the effect of laser fluence reduction to reduce pain during panretinal photocoagulation.

Patients And Methods: Twenty-five patients (50 eyes) with diabetic retinopathy who had indication for panretinal photocoagulation were included in this prospective, interventional, and comparative study. The right eyes were treated using low fluence parameters (LFP), whereas the left eyes were treated with standard fluence parameters (SFP). At the end of each session, the patient was asked to rate pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain) for each eye (NRS-11 scale). Fluence per burn and total fluence were determined for each eye. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: Pain perception (P < .01) and fluence per burn (P < .01) were significantly less using LFP compared with SFP. Pain was proportional to fluence per burn (R(2) = 0.4), but not to number of burns (R(2) = -0.2).

Conclusion: The use of LFP seems to be a good option to diminish the pain during panretinal photocoagulation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20100525-02DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain panretinal
12
panretinal photocoagulation
12
fluence burn
12
pain
8
eyes treated
8
fluence parameters
8
fluence
7
reduction fluence
4
fluence decrease
4
decrease pain
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: This systematic review aims to consolidate key findings regarding the efficacy of pain relief medications administered prior to pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) for diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Methods: A comprehensive search of major databases from 1993 to 2023 was conducted. Clinical trials comparing pain relief drugs before PRP in patients diagnosed with DR requiring PRP treatment were eligible for inclusion.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To compare the pain perception and treatment duration in patients undergoing panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) using Navilas laser versus conventional laser.

Methods: A study was conducted involving 40 patients with bilateral high-risk PDR. Each patient underwent PRP with conventional laser in one eye and Navilas laser in the other.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Pan-retinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the mainstay of treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), reducing the risk of severe vision loss. Pain poses a potential obstacle to effective laser delivery and patient compliance. Therefore, implementing pain relief strategies can enhance both treatment efficacy and patient comfort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To report a case of severe eye pain developing during dialysis. A case report was performed. A 41-year-old man with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes and end-stage nephropathy developed severe pain in the left eye during hemodialysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A total of 80 patients (average age 54.6) were split into two groups: Group A experienced muted machine sounds while Group B had the regular sound during the procedure.
  • * Results showed that 70% of Group A patients reported lower pain scores (grade 1 and 2) compared to 65% of Group B patients (grade 3 and 4), indicating that muting the machine can significantly reduce noise-related anxiety and improve patient cooperation
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!