AI Article Synopsis
- The mentorship assessment is crucial for students, prompting the creation of a tool to evaluate professors' skills in assessing Master's degree (MD) students in Education.
- An instrument called the mentorship assessment (EMA) was developed and validated, allowing students to evaluate their teachers across four MD programs using four main indicators (opening, disposition, respect, and expertise) with a total of 50 items.
- Although the overall EMA scores showed no significant differences among the MD programs, there were notable differences favoring the MD in education when each program was compared separately.
Article Abstract
Background: The mentorship assessment is important to the students. There is not an instrument that evaluates the professors' skills to assess students. Our objective was to build and validate an instrument to evaluate the teaching labor on assessment of Master's degree (MD) students in Education and to compare with other programs of MD.
Methods: Construct and validate an instrument to evaluate mentorship assessment (EMA) was carried out. It was answered by the students to evaluate their own teachers in four programs of MD. The instrument measure four indicators: opening, disposition, respect and expertise with a total of 50 items.
Results: The global scoring obtained in EMA didn't point out the statistical significant differences among the different programs of MD with the Kruskal-Wallis test, however statistical significant differences were found with chi(2) p < 0.05 when compared each program in favor of the MD in education.
Conclusions: The instrument EMA showed validity and consistency.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!