Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Aim: To study the outcome of cases of incidental adnexal masses detected during cesarean section.
Methods: A total of 126 093 live births and 39 115 cesarean deliveries performed between 2002 and 2008 were retrospectively evaluated and cases with additional adnexal masses and surgical interventions were included in the study. Histopathologic assessment and related outcomes were examined.
Results: One hundred and nineteen patients had incidental adnexal masses at the time of cesarean delivery; the incidence of adnexal masses was 1/329. The most common histopathologic diagnoses were mature cystic teratoma (32%) and functional cysts (26%). Six cases (5%) were bilateral. The mean cyst size was 6.4 cm; two of the masses were malignant.
Conclusion: Incidental masses detected at the time of cesarean section should be extirpated in order to exclude the possibility of malignancy and to avoid additional surgical procedures following cesarean section.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01177.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!