A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Do all antihypertensive drugs improve carotid intima-media thickness? A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. | LitMetric

Do all antihypertensive drugs improve carotid intima-media thickness? A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Fundam Clin Pharmacol

Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier A Chenevier, H Mondor, Av Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.

Published: June 2011

The many clinical trials investigating the effect of various antihypertensive drugs on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) produced conflicting results. We used meta-analysis to evaluate CIMT changes and network meta-analysis to rank drugs according to the magnitude of these changes. We identified 31 randomized controlled trials listed in three databases as of January 2008. Using a random-effects model, we found a significant CIMT decrease with antihypertensive drugs compared to placebo (-0.10 [-0.16; -0.04]). Overall effect sizes vs. placebo were significant for angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (-0.08 [-0.14; -0.02]), and a trend was found for beta-blockers (-0.09 [-0.19; 0.01]). The data did not allow other direct comparisons vs. placebo. Significant benefits were found for calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) compared to both ACE inhibitors (0.37 [0.20; 0.54]), as well as for angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) compared to beta-blockers (0.42 [0.29; 0.55]). Diuretics were less efficient than CCBs (-0.09 [-0.16; -0.02]). Indirect comparisons with network meta-analysis showed significant effects of CCBs and ARBs vs. placebo (both P < 0.05) and vs. diuretics (both P < 0.001). The CIMT decrease with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers was greater than with diuretics (both P < 0.05) but was not different from the placebo effect. In subgroup analyses, significant benefits occurred with lower baseline CIMT values and shorter treatment durations but were unrelated to the size of the blood pressure decrease. In conclusion, among antihypertensive drugs, CCBs and ARBs have the greatest effect on CIMT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2010.00832.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antihypertensive drugs
16
network meta-analysis
12
ace inhibitors
12
carotid intima-media
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
cimt decrease
8
ccbs arbs
8
cimt
6
placebo
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!