Insert INTO PMID_Summary(PMID,summaryText,IPAddress,dtCreated) VALUES (20575534, '** Little is known about how helical membrane proteins, like rhodopsin, fold, especially in their unfolded states. ** Researchers tested various chemical denaturants (SDS, urea, GuHCl, TFA) to see how they affected rhodopsin\'s structure and aggregation tendencies. ** Results showed that while all denaturants affected ellipticity and helix stability, only SDS effectively prevented protein aggregation, making it the recommended choice for studying unfolded rhodopsin without leading to aggregation. **','3.15.186.27',now()) Characterization of membrane protein non-native states. 1. Extent of unfolding and aggregation of rhodopsin in the presence of chemical denaturants. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Little is known about how helical membrane proteins, like rhodopsin, fold, especially in their unfolded states.
  • Researchers tested various chemical denaturants (SDS, urea, GuHCl, TFA) to see how they affected rhodopsin's structure and aggregation tendencies.
  • Results showed that while all denaturants affected ellipticity and helix stability, only SDS effectively prevented protein aggregation, making it the recommended choice for studying unfolded rhodopsin without leading to aggregation.

Article Abstract

Little is known about the general folding mechanisms of helical membrane proteins. Unfolded, i.e., non-native states, in particular, have not yet been characterized in detail. Here, we establish conditions under which denatured states of the mammalian membrane protein rhodopsin, a prototypic G protein coupled receptor with primary function in vision, can be studied. We investigated the effects of the chemical denaturants sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), urea, guanidine hydrochloride (GuHCl), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) on rhodopsin's secondary structure and propensity for aggregation. Ellipticity at 222 nm decreases in the presence of maximum concentrations of denaturants in the order TFA > GuHCl > urea > SDS + urea > SDS. Interpretation of these changes in ellipticity in terms of helix loss is challenged because the addition of some denaturants leads to aggregation. Through a combination of SDS-PAGE, dependence of ellipticity on protein concentration, and 1D (1)H NMR we show that aggregates form in the presence of GuHCl, TFA, and urea but not in any concentration of SDS, added over a range of 0.05%-30%. Mixed denaturant conditions consisting of 3% SDS and 8 M urea, added in this order, also did not result in aggregation. We conclude that SDS is able to prevent the exposure of large hydrophobic regions present in membrane proteins which otherwise leads to aggregation. Thus, 30% SDS and 3% SDS + 8 M urea are the denaturing conditions of choice to study maximally unfolded rhodopsin without aggregation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3243665PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi100338eDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sds urea
16
membrane protein
8
non-native states
8
chemical denaturants
8
membrane proteins
8
sds
8
urea sds
8
leads aggregation
8
aggregation
6
urea
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!