Background: This article describes the evidence review and guideline development method developed for the Clinical Preventive Guidelines for Immigrants and Refugees in Canada by the Canadian Collaboration for Immigrant and Refugee Health Guideline Committee.

Methods: The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) best-practice framework was combined with the recently developed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to produce evidence-based clinical guidelines for immigrants and refugees in Canada.

Results: A systematic approach was designed to produce the evidence reviews and apply the GRADE approach, including building on evidence from previous systematic reviews, searching for and comparing evidence between general and specific immigrant populations, and applying the GRADE criteria for making recommendations. This method was used for priority health conditions that had been selected by practitioners caring for immigrants and refugees in Canada.

Interpretation: This article outlines the 14-step method that was defined to standardize the guideline development process for each priority health condition.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168669PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090289DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immigrants refugees
16
guidelines immigrants
12
clinical preventive
8
preventive guidelines
8
refugees canada
8
guideline development
8
grade approach
8
priority health
8
evaluation evidence-based
4
evidence-based literature
4

Similar Publications

"Atlanta Is Like Wakanda… but With Real Big, Big Issues": A Focus Group Study of Community Strengths and Health Issues in Diverse Groups in Atlanta, Georgia.

Fam Community Health

January 2025

Author Affiliations: School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Tran, Mr Menyongai, Mss Foster, Scheib, and Allen, Drs Spears, Stauber, Owen-Smith, Weaver, and Huang, Prof Arias, Drs Cormier and Popova); Live Health DeKalb Coalition, Georgia (Ms Graham); Urban Studies Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Li); and Perimeter College, Georgia State University, Clarkston, Georgia (Drs Dolan and Lynch).

Background And Objectives: This qualitative study explored perceived community strengths and health issues among 3 underserved and under-studied populations in the Atlanta, Georgia-older adults, Black or African American persons, and refugees/immigrants/migrants.

Methods: Eight focus groups were conducted with 92 participants who were members of the 3 populations in Atlanta between November 2022 and March 2023.

Results: Although there were variations among groups, all groups emphasized diversity within their community as the foundation of community strength.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

As the COVID-19 pandemic recedes, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is crucial for reducing transmission and severity, but vaccine hesitancy remains a challenge. The study explored community actions and initiatives addressing vaccine hesitancy among Somali immigrant communities in cities in the Upper Midwest, USA, and Western Norway, focusing on trust factors and comparing members of the Somali diaspora in two distinct social and cultural contexts. Qualitative collective case studies were conducted, involving 14 semi-structured interviews with key informants from the Upper Midwest and Western Norway knowledgeable about initiatives designed to address SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stigma and discrimination-based narratives have been associated with adverse health outcomes. Migrants and refugees face multiple barriers to accessing healthcare, influenced by stigma and discrimination-based narratives against them. We conducted a scoping review of scientific and grey literature (n = 61) to discuss available evidence in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) concerning communication and narrative speeches related to international migration and its implications for population health, particularly when associated with stigma and discrimination against migrants and refugees.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study focuses on the perinatal outcomes of Vietnamese women in Germany, who represent 0.25% of the population, particularly comparing them to non-Vietnamese women.
  • Data from births between 2016 and 2019 at a Berlin hospital showed that while Vietnamese women had lower antenatal screening attendance, they experienced similar rates of 'ideal pregnancy outcomes' compared to their non-Vietnamese counterparts.
  • Factors like living in refugee shelters appeared to reduce the likelihood of caesarean sections and neonatal transfers, but having a Vietnamese migration background increased the risk of severe perineal tears.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!