Objective: To compare the risk of cerebrovascular adverse events with second-generation antipsychotic users versus those taking first-generation antipsychotics in community-dwelling older adults.
Method: A population-based retrospective cohort study matched on propensity score was used to examine the risk of cerebrovascular adverse events in second-generation antipsychotic users compared to first-generation antipsychotic users. IMS LifeLink Health Plan Claims Database was used to identify older adults (> or = 50 years) taking second-generation or first-generation antipsychotic agents from July 1, 2000, to December 31, 2007. Cox proportional hazards regression model stratified on matched pairs was used to examine the risk of hospitalization or emergency visits due to cerebrovascular adverse events within 1 year of follow-up (primary outcome measure). The covariates adjusted for include duration of therapy and exposure to other medication increasing risk of cerebrovascular adverse events.
Results: A total of 11,160 older adults (5,580 second-generation and 5,580 first-generation antipsychotic users) matched on propensity score was obtained. Regression analysis revealed that no statistically significant difference exists between second-generation and first-generation antipsychotic users with respect to risk of cerebrovascular adverse events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.858; 95% CI, 0.689-1.446). However, duration of therapy between 30-90 days (HR, 1.707; 95% CI, 1.174-2.481) and more than 90 days (HR, 1.570; 95% CI, 1.132-2.176) was associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular adverse events compared to duration of therapy less than 30 days.
Conclusions: The use of second-generation antipsychotic agents was found not to be associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular adverse events compared to first-generation agents in older adults. However, long-term use of second- and first-generation antipsychotic agents is associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular adverse events.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4088/JCP.09m05817yel | DOI Listing |
Exp Gerontol
January 2025
Cardiovascular Epidemiology of Aging, Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany; Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address:
Background: In light of growing evidence highlighting interactions between cardiac and brain health, we investigated associations of biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases with adverse outcomes (all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major cardiovascular events, and stroke) in persons with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS).
Methods: We used data from a cohort of persons with CCS for whom major adverse events were recorded over a follow-up of 20 years. We measured biomarkers of neurodegenerative diseases in baseline blood samples, using the Single-Molecule Array Technology on a HD-1 Analyzer.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
January 2025
Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address:
Background: Aspirin is a simple, globally available medication that has been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of colorectal cancer.
Methods: This phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 66 centres across 11 countries and territories (ten in Asia-Pacific; one in the Middle East).
JMIR Res Protoc
January 2025
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Background: In patients with atherosclerotic occlusive diseases, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report that antiplatelets, statins, and antihypertensives reduce the risk of major adverse cardiac events, need for revascularization procedures, mortality, and health care resource use. However, evidence suggests that these patients are not prescribed these medications adequately or do not adhere to them once prescribed.
Objective: We aim to systematically review and meta-analyze RCTs examining the effectiveness of implementation or adherence-supporting strategies for improving health care provider prescription of, or patient adherence to, guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications in patients with atherosclerotic occlusive disease.
World J Diabetes
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 51941, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Patients admitted with prediabetes and atrial fibrillation are at high risk for major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events independent of confounding variables. The shared pathophysiology between these three serious but common diseases and their association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk factors establish a vicious circle culminating in high atherogenicity. Because of that, it is of paramount importance to perform risk stratification of patients with prediabetes to define phenotypes that benefit from various interventions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!