A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Endoscopic submucosal dissection training with pig models in a Western country. | LitMetric

Aim: To test a strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in animal models designed to overcome the initial learning curve.

Methods: ESD was attempted in ex vivo and in vivo pig models. Thirty ESD procedures were attempted in the esophagus (n = 9) or the stomach (n = 21). The ex vivo model was used until initial competence was achieved. In the in vivo model, several ESD procedures were performed in up to 3 sessions. The following variables were analyzed: specimen size, complete and en bloc resection rate, time for circumferential incision, time for submucosal dissection, total ESD duration, and complications.

Results: Complete resection was achieved in 28 cases (en bloc 27); 2 could not be completed (one perforation, one technical difficulty). The mean +/- SD time for circumferential incision was 36.2 +/- 16.8 min (range: 8-87 min), and the mean +/- SD time for submucosal dissection was 45.1 +/- 35.7 min (range: 9-196 min). The mean +/- SD size of the resected specimens was 45.2 +/- 17.8 mm. The mean +/- SD total resection time was significantly increased for the gastric cases performed in the first half of the study (n = 13) than in the second half (n = 8) (98.9 +/- 62.4 min vs 61.7 +/- 17.6 min, P = 0.04), although the specimen size did not differ.

Conclusion: Training in animal models could help endoscopists overcome the learning curve before starting ESD in humans.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2887585PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i23.2895DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

submucosal dissection
16
+/-
9
endoscopic submucosal
8
pig models
8
training animal
8
animal models
8
esd procedures
8
vivo model
8
specimen size
8
time circumferential
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!