Abdominal wall closure: resident education and human error.

Hernia

South East Area Health Education Center, Department of Surgery, New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA.

Published: October 2010

Purpose: Secure abdominal wall closure for laparotomy incisions is paramount in prevention of hernia formation. Despite the importance, abdominal closure is often delegated to the resident surgeon. The purpose of this study was to assess residents' formal training, knowledge, and technique in abdominal wall closure.

Methods: All surgical residents in our training program participated in a skills laboratory and completed a questionnaire. The skills portion involved closure of a 10-cm incision on a simulated abdominal wall. Participants were timed, videotaped, and graded using a standardized grading system. Lengths of the suture bites were measured. Regression analysis was used to compare results based on number of closures. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Ten surgical residents participated. The average time for closure was 4:23 min (range 3:08-5:65 min). The average distance between the bite and the incision was 0.9 cm and between bites was 0.8 cm. All knots were satisfactory and intact following closure. Participants' experience varied with a range from 0 to 230 previous abdominal closures. All residents chose to perform closure in a continuous fashion using a slowly absorbing suture. All but one resident stated that sutures should be placed 1 cm from the incision with 1 cm advances. Only one resident knew the correct suture-to-wound length ratio for closure, and only four residents were familiar with the literature about abdominal wall closure. With increasing closure experience, there was significant improvement in time and motion of suturing (P = 0.02), respect of tissue (P = 0.0002), instrument handling (P = 0.004), orientation of needle (P = 0.0076), and flow of closure (P = 0.046). Residents who had performed more closures took significantly larger suture bites (P = 0.03) with larger distances between bites (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: Surgical technique improves with increased experience with abdominal closures; however, residents at all levels have the physical ability to adequately perform this task. Education regarding closure appears to be lacking, and further study warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0691-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abdominal wall
16
wall closure
8
abdominal
5
closure
4
closure resident
4
resident education
4
education human
4
human error
4
error purpose
4
purpose secure
4

Similar Publications

Aims: Image-based, patient-specific rupture risk analysis of AAAs is promising but it is limited by invasive and costly imaging modalities. Ultrasound (US) offers a safe, more affordable alternative, allowing multiple assessments during follow-up and enabling longitudinal studies on AAA rupture risk.

Methods And Results: This study used time-resolved three-dimensional US to assess AAA rupture risk parameters over time, based on vessel and intraluminal thrombus (ILT) geometry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diverticular colon disease is the most common cause of colovesical fistulas, a rare and complex entity in their diagnosis and treatment. This report details the case of a 56-year-old patient who had presented with pneumaturia and gas in the vagina for six years and exudate in the abdominal wall in a midline wound. Given the suspicion, the diagnosis of the triple colonic fistula was confirmed by imaging studies: enteroatmospheric, colovesical, and colotubal, which were managed surgically.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Atherogenesis is prone in medium and large-sized vessels, such as the aorta and coronary arteries, where hemodynamic stress is critical. Low and oscillatory wall shear stress contributes significantly to endothelial dysfunction and inflammation. Murray's law minimizes energy expenditure in vascular networks and applies to small arteries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery (NSS) can be performed by mainly 2 methods, offclamp or on-clamp. Continuous bleeding during the off-clamp method may impair the clear visualization of the border between the tumor and parenchyma, even though it is done safely in experienced hands. Therefore, some surgical modifications may be needed during mass excision and renorraphy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!