Background: Low-cost indigenous megaprostheses used in the developing world are prone to mechanical failure but the frequency and causes are not well established.

Questions/purposes: We retrospectively analyzed the causes of failure, particularly design, and suggest changes to reduce the breakage. We also report our experience with revision surgery.

Methods: We identified 28 breakages in 266 megaprosthetic knee arthroplasties performed between January 2000 and December 2006. Twenty-six breakages were revised to another prosthesis. The complications were studied and the function was evaluated. Prostheses were studied for failure by the computer-aided design program SolidWorks(®) and Hyperworks(®) for finite element analysis (FEA). Design improvements were performed based on these results.

Results: In 21 cases, the failure occurred at the stem-collar junction, the point of maximum stress predicted by FEA. Stainless steel implants were prone to failure. There was one early and one late infection. Three patients died of metastatic disease. The most difficult surgical step involved the removal of the well-cemented broken stem from the intramedullary canal. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores varied from 27 to 29 after revision. FEA revealed stress could be reduced by filleting the stem-collar junction and by two-piece stems.

Conclusions: Revisions of broken total knee megaprostheses, though technically difficult, have allowed patients reasonable function. We recommend design analysis for custom prostheses to point to areas of weakness. Breakages can be reduced by using titanium stems and filleting the junction or by having two-piece inserted stems. Incorporating these changes has reduced the failures in our experience.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2947678PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1409-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knee megaprostheses
8
stem-collar junction
8
junction two-piece
8
failure
5
revision broken
4
broken knee
4
megaprostheses solution
4
solution problems
4
problems background
4
background low-cost
4

Similar Publications

Distal femoral replacement (DFR) with megaprostheses is a salvage revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) procedure indicated in cases with massive bone defects in the distal femur. As long as these implants achieve fixation only in the diaphysis, the high aseptic loosening rate reported in some series is probably related to a lack of rotational stability. Two patients with extensive distal femoral bone defects with preservation of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction underwent rTKA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endoprosthetic knee replacement using megaprostheses has become a common strategy for preserving joint function in patients with distal femur tumors. While existing literature has primarily focused on surgical techniques, complications, and implants, recent improvements in patient survival rates have sparked increased interest in the long-term functional outcomes associated with this treatment.

Methods: This case-control study evaluated functional outcomes-Timed Up and Go (TUG), 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), knee flexor and extensor muscle strength, and sagittal knee range of motion-and health-related quality of life (SF-36) between patients with distal femoral megaprostheses (n = 31) and healthy controls (n = 48).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after proximal and distal femoral replacement.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

November 2024

Unit Inserm COMETE, UMR U1075, Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, CHU de Caen, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14033 Caen Cedex, France.

Introduction: Femoral megaprostheses are used for bone reconstruction surgery in patients with local tumors or who require multiple revisions. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a subjective result and, like patient satisfaction, have become an integral part of the outcomes in orthopedics. However, the threshold of satisfaction (PASS: Patient Acceptable Symptom State) has not yet been defined in a French population after this type of arthroplasty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This review aimed to determine outcomes following megaprostheses in non-oncological indications for knee arthroplasty, including range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures of function, pain, and quality of life (QoL).

Methods: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane via Ovid and PubMed between January 2003 and June 2023 was conducted. Studies reporting function, pain, ROM, and/or QoL in non-oncological patients who have received knee megaprostheses were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses.

Medicina (Kaunas)

March 2024

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious risk following the surgical reconstruction of large bone defects in joints like the knee or hip, particularly in cancer patients.
  • The increasing use of megaprostheses in orthopedic surgeries implies that the incidence of PJI may rise, making effective management crucial but debatable due to the limited number of cases.
  • This review discusses various management strategies for PJI, including debridement, single-stage and two-stage implant exchanges, and their outcomes based on research from the past 15 years.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!