AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study evaluates the use of the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen (MASS) by paramedics in Australia, highlighting its effectiveness for diagnosing strokes compared to other methods, particularly the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale, which has been found to be less effective.
  • - Data from 2008 shows that MASS was used in 16% of emergency transports, and the sensitivity and specificity of paramedic diagnoses were generally high, with paramedic diagnosis being more sensitive than the MASS and similar to the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale.
  • - Overall, the findings indicate that paramedics have successfully integrated MASS into their assessment process for strokes, maintaining a high level of diagnostic performance since its implementation in 2005.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Recent evidence suggests the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale is ineffectively used and lacks sensitivity and specificity. Melbourne (Australia) paramedics have been using the Melbourne Ambulance Stroke Screen (MASS) since 2005. The aim of this study was to review the real-world use of MASS 3 years after city wide implementation.

Methods: Two groups of consecutively admitted patients to an Australian hospital between January and May 2008 were used: (1) patients for whom paramedics performed MASS; and (2) patients with a discharge diagnosis of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Use of MASS was examined for all transports and for patients diagnosed with stroke or transient ischemic attack. The sensitivity and specificity of paramedic diagnosis, MASS, and Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale were calculated. Paramedic diagnosis of stroke among patients with stroke was statistically compared with those obtained immediately post-MASS implementation in 2002.

Results: For the study period, MASS was performed for 850 (16%) of 5286 emergency transports, including 199 of 207 (96%) patients with confirmed stroke and transient ischemic attack. In patients in whom MASS was performed (n=850), the sensitivity of paramedic diagnosis of stroke (93%, 95% CI: 88% to 96%) was higher than the MASS (83%, 95% CI: 77% to 88%, P=0.003) and equivalent to Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (88%, 95% CI: 83% to 92%, P=0.120), whereas the specificity of the paramedic diagnosis of stroke (87%, 95% CI: 84% to 89%) was equivalent to MASS (86%, 95% CI: 83% to 88%, P=0.687) and higher than Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (79%, 95% CI: 75% to 82%, P<0.001). The initial improvement in stroke paramedic diagnosis seen in 2002 (94%, 95% CI: 86% to 98%) was sustained in 2008 (89%, 95% CI: 84% to 94%, P=0.19).

Conclusions: In our experience, paramedics have successfully incorporated MASS into the assessment of neurologically compromised patients. The initial improvement to the paramedics' diagnosis of stroke with MASS was sustained 3 years after city wide implementation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571836DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paramedic diagnosis
20
diagnosis stroke
20
cincinnati prehospital
16
prehospital stroke
16
stroke scale
16
stroke
14
stroke transient
12
transient ischemic
12
ischemic attack
12
mass
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!