What do symptom scores mean: observations on discrepancies when defining symptoms using words and numbers.

Eur J Oncol Nurs

Palliative Care Consult Team, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5.

Published: December 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) is increasingly used for symptom screening in cancer and palliative care, but how patients interpret and select symptom scores is not well understood.
  • The study surveyed 400 oncology patients, revealing a positive correlation between numerical and verbal symptom rankings, yet discrepancies existed, especially with terms like 'mild' and 'moderate'.
  • Healthcare providers must recognize that numerical and verbal responses may not accurately reflect a patient’s symptom experience, indicating a need for deeper understanding in patient assessments.

Article Abstract

Unlabelled: The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) has become a more frequently used tool for symptom screening in oncology and palliative care settings in Ontario. The process patients use to select symptom scores however is poorly understood.

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to consider what patients mean when assigning numbers or words to symptoms, and the implications for healthcare providers who interpret these responses.

Methods And Sample: A previously conducted study in our organization asked four hundred inpatient and ambulatory oncology patients to rank ESAS symptoms with the usual numerical responses (0-10) and then with word phrases of 'none', 'mild', 'moderate', or 'severe' to examine the relationship between chosen numbers and words.

Key Results: Although results showed a strong positive correlation between number and word rankings for each ESAS symptom, closer examination revealed that for some patients there were discrepancies between chosen numbers and words, with broad numerical ranges, particularly for the words 'mild' and 'moderate'. Through a secondary analysis, these discrepant responses are explored and relevant literature is presented that highlights the importance of understanding patients as they communicate their symptoms.

Conclusions: Health care providers need to be aware of the potential for discrepancies when reviewing patient self-reported data. Numbers and words may not fully capture a patient's symptom burden; further exploration is required to gain a more comprehensive understanding of a patient's current state of being.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2010.04.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

symptom scores
8
'mild' 'moderate'
8
chosen numbers
8
symptom
6
numbers
5
patients
5
scores observations
4
observations discrepancies
4
discrepancies defining
4
defining symptoms
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!