Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Xenon is a promising anesthetic agent in neurosurgery. However, there is now little evidence on the effect of xenon at anesthetic concentrations on brain electrical activity, which limits its use in neurosurgical patients. Changes in brain bioelectrical activity were studied in patients with skull base tumors before surgery (conscious ones) and at different stages of xenon anesthesia (after denitrogenization, at 50% xenon concentration in the circuit, at 65% xenon concentration in the circuit, during steady-state xenon anesthesia, and after hyperventilation). EEG during xenon anesthesia was similar to that during propofol anesthesia; a circuit xenon concentration (50 or 65%) and a ventilation mode had no considerable impact on EEG. Xenon did not induce paroxysmal activity. The findings suggest that the use of xenon anesthesia in neurosurgical patients is safe in terms of its impact on brain bioelectrical activity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!