A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of angiotensin receptor blockade on atrial electrical remodelling and the 'second factor' in a goat burst-paced model of atrial fibrillation. | LitMetric

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is self-perpetuating, via mechanisms of acute electrical remodelling and 'second factors' acting over a longer time course. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade may inhibit AF self-perpetuation. We evaluated the effects of RAS blockade with candesartan in a burst-paced goat model of lone AF in which both mechanisms are known to operate. Bioactivity of oral candesartan was demonstrated in 10 goats by inhibition of the pressor effect of angiotensin II. The effects of candesartan on electrical remodelling were assessed in 12 placebo and 12 candesartan-treated goats in a 28-day burst pacing protocol. To assess the effects of candesartan on second factors (structural remodelling), 16 goats underwent further 28-day periods of burst pacing (two periods in 16 goats, three periods in eight goats) each separated by periods of sinus rhythm sufficient for electrical remodelling to reverse. There was a progressive rise in angiotensin levels in both groups. Candesartan (0.5 mg/kg/day) achieved a 76% blunting of the pressor effect of angiotensin II and had no effect on electrical remodelling; the half time for fall of atrial effective refractory period (AERP) was 22.3 ± 4.9 h (placebo) and 22.0 ± 3.2 h (candesartan) (p = ns). Candesartan had no effect on AF stability, which progressively increased over successive 28-day periods (ANOVA p < 0.05). Candesartan had no effect on atrial electrical remodelling or the operation of 'second factors' in a goat model of lone AF. These findings suggest that any benefits of RAS blockade in patients with AF are unlikely to be due to direct effects on atrial remodelling.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470320310369604DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrical remodelling
24
ras blockade
12
atrial electrical
8
remodelling
8
remodelling 'second
8
atrial fibrillation
8
'second factors'
8
candesartan
8
goat model
8
model lone
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!