Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of men aged 65-74 years reduces the AAA-related mortality and is generally considered cost effective. Despite of this only a few national health care services have implemented permanent programs. Around 10% of men in this group have peripheral arterial disease (PAD) defined by an ankle brachial systolic blood pressure index (ABI) below 0.9 resulting in an increased mortality-rate of 25-30%. In addition well-documented health benefits may be achieved through primary prophylaxis by initiating systematic cholesterol-lowering, smoking cessation, low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirins), exercise, a healthy diet and blood-pressure control altogether reducing the increased risks for cardiovascular disease by at least 20-25%. The benefits of combining screening for AAA and PAD seem evident; yet they remain to be established. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of a combined screening program for AAA, PAD and hypertension.
Methods: The Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial is a randomized, clinically controlled study designed to evaluate the benefits of vascular screening and modern vascular prophylaxis in a population of 50,000 men aged 65-74 years. Enrolment started October 2008 and is expected to stop in October 2010. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are cardiovascular mortality, AAA-related mortality, hospital services related to cardiovascular conditions, prevalence of AAA, PAD and potentially undiagnosed hypertension, health-related quality of life and cost effectiveness. Data analysis by intention to treat.
Results: Major follow-up will be performed at 3, 5 and 10 years and final study result after 15 years.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00662480.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891736 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-67 | DOI Listing |
Biomolecules
November 2024
Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
There is currently no clinically valid biomarker for predicting the growth and prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The most promising candidates with the highest diagnostic values are plasma D-dimers and markers of activated neutrophils, i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Vasc Surg
December 2024
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center of Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Background: This review provides an overview of the literature on shared decision-making (SDM) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and identifies barriers and facilitators.
Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted, in which 4 databases were systematically searched for the period January 2007 to November 2024. All articles were reviewed by 2 independent authors and asses for quality using the mixed-methods appraisal tool (MMAT).
Front Immunol
August 2024
Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development is driven by inflammation, in particular myeloid cells, which represent attractive biomarker candidates. Yet to date, the maximum aortic diameter is the only clinically applied predictor of AAA progression and indicator for surgical repair. We postulated that aortic inflammation is reflected in a systemic change of monocyte populations, which we investigated regarding marker potential in AAA diagnosis and prognosis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Imaging
June 2024
Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, UMR INSERM U 1069, Hôpital Trousseau, CHRU de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours Cedex 9, 37044, France.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!