Background: Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of men aged 65-74 years reduces the AAA-related mortality and is generally considered cost effective. Despite of this only a few national health care services have implemented permanent programs. Around 10% of men in this group have peripheral arterial disease (PAD) defined by an ankle brachial systolic blood pressure index (ABI) below 0.9 resulting in an increased mortality-rate of 25-30%. In addition well-documented health benefits may be achieved through primary prophylaxis by initiating systematic cholesterol-lowering, smoking cessation, low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (aspirins), exercise, a healthy diet and blood-pressure control altogether reducing the increased risks for cardiovascular disease by at least 20-25%. The benefits of combining screening for AAA and PAD seem evident; yet they remain to be established. The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and the cost-effectiveness of a combined screening program for AAA, PAD and hypertension.

Methods: The Viborg Vascular (VIVA) screening trial is a randomized, clinically controlled study designed to evaluate the benefits of vascular screening and modern vascular prophylaxis in a population of 50,000 men aged 65-74 years. Enrolment started October 2008 and is expected to stop in October 2010. The primary outcome is all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes are cardiovascular mortality, AAA-related mortality, hospital services related to cardiovascular conditions, prevalence of AAA, PAD and potentially undiagnosed hypertension, health-related quality of life and cost effectiveness. Data analysis by intention to treat.

Results: Major follow-up will be performed at 3, 5 and 10 years and final study result after 15 years.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00662480.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2891736PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-67DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aaa pad
12
viborg vascular
8
vascular viva
8
viva screening
8
screening trial
8
men aged
8
aged 65-74
8
65-74 years
8
aaa-related mortality
8
screening
6

Similar Publications

There is currently no clinically valid biomarker for predicting the growth and prognosis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). The most promising candidates with the highest diagnostic values are plasma D-dimers and markers of activated neutrophils, i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This review provides an overview of the literature on shared decision-making (SDM) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and identifies barriers and facilitators.

Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted, in which 4 databases were systematically searched for the period January 2007 to November 2024. All articles were reviewed by 2 independent authors and asses for quality using the mixed-methods appraisal tool (MMAT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Studies show that a genetically determined increase in lipoprotein(a) by 50 mg/dl raises the risk for PAD and AAA, with hazard ratios indicating significantly higher risks for individuals in the top percentile of lipoprotein(a) levels compared to those in the lower percentile.
  • * The review emphasizes the importance of providing clinicians with risk prediction tools and suggests that reducing lipoprotein(a) through future therapies could lessen the negative health
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development is driven by inflammation, in particular myeloid cells, which represent attractive biomarker candidates. Yet to date, the maximum aortic diameter is the only clinically applied predictor of AAA progression and indicator for surgical repair. We postulated that aortic inflammation is reflected in a systemic change of monocyte populations, which we investigated regarding marker potential in AAA diagnosis and prognosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • RECIST criteria for assessing cancer therapy response, especially for bevacizumab, are often insufficient compared to new radiological biomarkers like tumor-to-liver density (TTLD) ratio and modified size-based criteria.
  • A study analyzing 79 out of 137 colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) patients found that a TTLD ratio greater than 0.6 at baseline was a significant predictor for longer progression-free and overall survival, while tumor size reduction did not correlate with TTLD variations.
  • The findings support the use of TTLD ratio as an early indicator of long-term clinical outcomes and its association with improved perfusion parameters in patients undergoing treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!