AI Article Synopsis
- The ACTION study analyzed the effectiveness of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in improving clinical outcomes among specific subgroups of patients, particularly those receiving optimal therapy without RAS blockers.
- The study used an intention-to-treat approach, comparing treatment groups using statistical methods to evaluate hazard ratios and significance of results.
- Key findings showed that patients taking nifedipine GITS had significant reductions in cardiovascular events and stroke compared to other treatments, indicating its beneficial role in managing symptomatic coronary artery disease.
Article Abstract
Introduction: Retrospective analyses of specific subgroups of patients from the database of the ACTION study have evaluated the effectiveness of a nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) on clinical outcomes. These subgroups included those patients receiving: 1) full "optimal" therapy at baseline; 2) full "optimal" therapy at baseline but excluding renin angiotensin system (RAS)-blocking drugs; 3) treatment with nifedipine GITS who were not treated with RAS blockers versus those treated with RAS blockers but not nifedipine GITS.
Methods: Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Treatment groups were compared by log-rank test without adjustment for covariates. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were obtained using Cox proportional hazards models with treatment allocation as the only covariate.
Results: 2461 patients randomized in ACTION were receiving optimal therapy (beta blockers, nitrates, aspirin, statins) excluding RAS blockers at baseline. There were reductions associated with nifedipine GITS compared with placebo in all prespecified endpoints but statistical significance was only achieved for debilitating stroke (48%; P<0.02) and coronary angiography (14%; P<0.05). These benefits were paralleled by a -4.1 and -2.8 mmHg difference between the groups for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Patients randomized to nifedipine GITS but no RAS blockers (n=2966) when compared to those receiving RAS blockers but no nifedipine GITS (n=880) had highly statistically significant reductions in cardiovascular events (22%), new-onset heart failure (53%), and debilitating stroke (45%). However, the groups differed in their baseline characteristics.
Conclusion: Addition of nifedipine GITS to the treatment regimen of selected patient groups with symptomatic coronary artery disease results in a significant reduction of cardiovascular morbidity. While the interpretation of these subgroup analyses must obviously be cautious, there is a clear message relating to "best practice" treatment of angina, which suggests that "reliance" on RAS blockade may be misplaced and greater attention should be directed towards control of blood pressure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-010-0029-2 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of a calcium-channel blocker and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in Chinese and European patients with hypertension.
Am J Hypertens
December 2024
IRCCS, Istituto Auxologic Italliano, Department of Cardiology, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Article Synopsis
- - The study examined how effective and safe nifedipine GITS and ramipril are for treating hypertension in Chinese versus European patients through a post-hoc analysis of a multinational trial.
- - The research found that while both medications reduced blood pressure similarly across ethnic groups, ethnic differences impacted age, body mass index, and certain blood pressure measurements, and the response to treatment varied between the two groups.
- - The safety profiles noted significant differences, with fewer adverse events in Chinese patients taking nifedipine, while Europeans experienced more ankle edema with nifedipine and dry cough with ramipril.
Blood pressure variability assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements before and during antihypertensive drug treatment: a sub-analysis of the REVERENT randomized trial.
J Hypertens
August 2024
IRCCS, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Department of Cardiology, San Luca Hospital.
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how different methods of measuring blood pressure variability (OBP, HBP, and ABP) are related and agree with each other, particularly before and after starting treatment for high blood pressure.
- Participants included untreated hypertensive individuals who were given either ramipril or nifedipine GITS for 10 weeks, with their blood pressure variability assessed using standard deviation and coefficient of variation.
- Results showed only weak-to-moderate correlations between home and ambulatory BP measurements, indicating that while they can identify individuals with high blood pressure variability, they do not align well with office measurements.
Seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment.
J Hypertens
May 2024
School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Background: We investigated seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in hypertensive patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment.
Methods: The study participants were hypertensive patients enrolled in an 8-week therapeutic study. Antihypertensive treatment was initiated with long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers amlodipine 5 mg/day or the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine 30 mg/day, with the possible up-titration to amlodipine 10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 60 mg/day at 4 weeks of follow-up.
Dosing Time Matters? Nighttime vs. Daytime Administration of Nifedipine Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System (GITS) or Amlodipine on Non-dipper Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial of NARRAS.
Front Cardiovasc Med
November 2021
Department of Internal Medicine, North China Electric Power University Hospital, Beijing, China.
Non-dipper hypertension is often characterized by a blunted decrease of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) and is associated with increased risk of target organ damage and cardiovascular (CV) events, while the optimal treatment strategy is yet to be established. This trial was designed to evaluate whether nocturnal BP reduction and arterial stiffness improvement differ from antihypertensive agents and time of administration. Young and middle-aged adults (18-65 years) with non-dipper hypertension were randomly assigned to nifedipine GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system) 30 mg or amlodipine besylate 5 mg once daily for 8 weeks, either taken in the morning or at night.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSerum uric acid change in relation to antihypertensive therapy with the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.
Blood Press
December 2021
Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials, The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Purpose: We investigated serum uric acid changes in relation to the achieved clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after 8 weeks of antihypertensive therapy with two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.
Materials And Methods: The study participants were patients with clinic and ambulatory hypertension, enrolled in a randomised controlled trial that compared amlodipine (5-10 mg, = 215) and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS, 30-60 mg, = 203). Hyperuricaemia was defined as a serum uric acid concentration of ≥420 µmol/L in men and ≥360 µmol/L in women.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!