AI Article Synopsis

  • This study analyzed the best material combination for single implant-supported prostheses using finite element analysis, focusing on different fit patterns.
  • Two models were created: one with a precise fit (group A) and another with a slight angular misfit (group B), with each grouped according to various materials for both the framework and veneering.
  • Results showed that the misfit increased stress in the implant and retention screw, while certain material combinations, like porcelain/titanium and porcelain/zirconia, exhibited better stress distribution; stiffer materials were deemed more appropriate for optimal performance.

Article Abstract

This finite element analysis study evaluated the optimal material combination for the superstructure of single implant-supported prosthesis with different fit patterns. Two models of a two-dimensional finite element analysis were constructed: group A (control), prosthesis presenting precise fit to implant; and group B, prostheses with unilateral angular misfit of 100 microm. Each group was divided into 5 subgroups according to different materials for framework (gold alloy, titanium, and zirconia) and veneering (porcelain and modified composite resin). Evaluation was performed on ANSYS software with 133-N load applied at the opposite side of misfit on the model. The load was applied with a 30-degree angulation and 2-mm off-axis. The presence of unilateral angular misfit (group B) increased the von Mises stresses in the implant (40%) and retention screw (7%) in comparison to group A. The combination of porcelain/titanium and porcelain/zirconia displayed more favorable stress distribution. When gold alloy was used as a framework material, there was no difference in stress values for both veneering materials in all groups. The use of stiffer and softer superstructures materials did not affect the stress distribution and stress values in the supporting tissue. According to the biomechanical point of view, materials with high elasticity modulus are more suitable for the superstructure of implant-supported prosthesis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d7f2e5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stress distribution
12
implant-supported prosthesis
12
finite element
12
element analysis
12
single implant-supported
8
unilateral angular
8
angular misfit
8
gold alloy
8
load applied
8
stress values
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!