Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Lithium (Li+) absorption across the low-resistance epithelium of the rabbit gall-bladder was studied in order to elucidate possible routes and mechanisms of Li+ transfer. Li+ at a concentration of 0.4 mM in both mucosal and serosal media did not affect isosmotic mucosa-to-serosa fluid absorption. At this low concentration net mucosa-to-serosa Li+ absorption was insignificant when the ambient Na+ concentration was 115 mM, although the gall-bladder had a significant Li+ permeability (2.7 X 10(-5) cm s-1) and a significant mucosa-to-serosa Li+ gradient developed as a result of fluid absorption. Net Li+ absorption was induced at reduced mucosal Na+ concentrations (by lowering the Na+ concentration down to 50 mM with or without substitution with sucrose, or by adding sucrose to the mucosal medium). This Li+ absorption occurred even in the absence of a mucosa-to-serosa Li+ gradient. Na+ and Li+ absorptions occurring at 50 mM Na+ were inhibited to the same degree by mucosal 1 mM amiloride. Substitution of 5-50 mM (44%) Na+ by Li+ in the external medium dose-dependently depressed Na+ absorption by up to 76%, while substitution by 50 mM choline had no significant effect. Li+ inhibition of Na+ absorption was elicited from the mucosal side and was not accounted for by compensatory Li+ absorption; water and Na+ absorption rates decreased nearly in parallel. The effects of 0.4 mM amiloride and of substitution with 20 mM Li+ were only partly additive. It is concluded that Li+ absorption in the rabbit gall-bladder cannot be explained by passive (paracellular) transport, but must be the result of transcellular, active transport. Both at low and at high concentrations Li+ may enter the cell via an Na+/H+ exchanger in the apical cell membrane. At high concentrations Li+ may inhibit Na+ absorption by interference with the exchange mechanism and/or via effects at the cytoplasmic level. The Li+ transfer mechanism across the basolateral cell membrane remains unknown.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1991.tb09067.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!