AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing ankle injuries compared to arthroscopy findings in patients with chronic ankle pain or instability.
  • MRI showed 100% specificity for diagnosing tears in specific ligaments and osteochondral lesions but had lower sensitivity, particularly for CFL tears.
  • The conclusion suggests that while MRI is reliable for identifying certain injuries, negative MRI results should be taken seriously, and further arthroscopy may be necessary for a definitive diagnosis.

Article Abstract

Background: The aim of our study is to determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in relation to arthroscopic findings in patients presenting with chronic ankle pain and/or instability.

Methods: All patients who underwent arthroscopy of the ankle as well as MRI from December 2005 to July 2008 in our institution were reviewed by the Orthopaedic surgeons. Twenty-four patients were identified and the results of MRI scans were compared with arthroscopic findings. This study specifically looked at anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and osteochondral lesions (OCD). Arthroscopic findings were considered as a gold standard. There were 12 female and 12 male patients with an average age 39 years (11-65 years). Time interval between MRI scan and arthroscopy was 7.0 months (2-18 months).

Results: In our study MRI showed 100% specificity for the diagnosis of ATFL and CFL tears and osteochondral lesions. However sensitivity was low particularly for CFL tears. Accuracy of MRI in detecting ATFL tear was 91.7%, CFL tear was 87.5% and osteochondral lesion was 83.3%.

Conclusions: We conclude that MRI scan has very high specificity and positive predictive value in diagnosing tears of ATFL, CFL and osteochondral lesions. However sensitivity was low with MRI. In a symptomatic patient negative results on MRI must be viewed with caution and an arthroscopy may still be required for a definitive diagnosis and treatment. However high resolution scans may differ in their ability to pick up these lesions and further research is required to assess their efficiency as evidence is not currently available.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.05.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mri scan
16
arthroscopic findings
12
osteochondral lesions
12
mri
9
accuracy mri
8
cfl osteochondral
8
atfl cfl
8
cfl tears
8
lesions sensitivity
8
sensitivity low
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!