Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Endourological modalities are considered the first line of treatment for benign ureterointestinal anastomotic strictures except in long strictures, completely obliterated lumen, prior radiation, and poor renal function. Endoureterotomy provided better success than balloon dilatation. In poor-operative risk patients, metal or double-J stents are viable options. Endourological treatments of upper tract stones after diversion are indicated for stones not suitable for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or to salvage SWL failure. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was preferred for large or complex renal stones, whereas ureteroscopy was used for smaller stones. The evaluation of stone-free status and regular follow-up are mandatory because of the high recurrence rate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.014 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!