Comparison of analytical strategies for EEG-correlated fMRI data in patients with epilepsy.

The simultaneous recording of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can be used to localize interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). Previous studies have reported varying degrees of concordance of EEG-fMRI with electroclinical findings. The aim of the present study is to evaluate to what extent this variability is determined by the analytical strategy or by the properties of the EEG data. For that purpose, 42 IED sets obtained in 29 patients with epilepsy were reanalyzed using a finite impulse response approach, which estimates the hemodynamic response function (HRF) from the data and allows non-causal effects. Cardiac effects were treated as additional confounders in the model. This approach was compared to the classical approach assuming a fixed HRF for each voxel in the brain. The performance of each method was assessed by comparing the fMRI results to the EEG focus. The flexible model revealed more significantly activated voxels, which resulted in more activated brain regions concordant with the EEG focus (26 vs. 16). Correction for cardiac effects improved the results in 7 out of the 42 data sets. Furthermore, design theory for event-related experiments was applied in order to determine the influence of the number of IEDs and their temporal distribution on the success of an experiment. It appeared that this success is highly dependent upon the number of IEDs present during the recording and less on their temporal spacing. We conclude that the outcome of EEG-fMRI can be improved by using an optimized analytical strategy, but also depends on the number of IEDs occurring during the recording.