[Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease: colchicine vs. colchicine plus vitamin E].

Actas Urol Esp

Instituto H. Ellis, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Published: May 2010

Objective: To retrospectively review the response of patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) treated with colchicine as monotherapy and colchicine plus Vitamin E.

Material And Methods: We evaluated 100 men with PD. A dose of 1.5 mg/day oral Colchicine as monotherapy (CCM) was given to 59 patients and 1.5/800 mg/day oral Colchicine/Vitamin E (CCVE) to 41. Response was categorized as follows: Good response, when at least 2 of the following conditions were achieved: Decrease/stabilization of curvature and/or plaque and/or pain relief. Partial response if one of the former conditions were observed. No response and worsening. No statistical differences between groups were found.

Results: Good response was observed in 39% vs 41% in the CCM and CCVE groups respectively. When looking at each variable, we observed improvement on the plaque's size in 36 vs 29%, pain relief in 46 vs 57% and curvature 32 vs 33% in the CCM and CCVE respectively. None of these differences were statistically significant.

Conclusion: Oral conservative treatment with CCVE failed to show statistically significant differences in efficacy in pain relief, penile curvature or plaque size against CCM in this study. However, there is slight evidence of a positive prognostic effect on the conservative treatment when history of previous unsuccessful PD treatment was recorded, this was statistically significant in the CCVE group, supporting the theory of a combined treatment. A randomized double blind placebo controlled study with a sample size calculation should be performed to confirm our results.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain relief
12
peyronie's disease
8
colchicine vitamin
8
colchicine monotherapy
8
mg/day oral
8
good response
8
response conditions
8
ccm ccve
8
conservative treatment
8
response
6

Similar Publications

Objectives: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with endotherapy (ET) is the first-line treatment in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and main pancreatic duct stone (PDS). Our study aimed to evaluate factors that predict the outcome of ESWL in CP patients with PDS.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 166 patients with CP and radiopaque PDS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Between half and three quarters of the working-age population in today's industrialized globe suffers from lower back pain. The presence of a myofascial trigger point-a hyperirritable painful area comprised of a small number of muscle fibers-identifies mechanical back pain sufferers as suffering from myofascial pain syndrome, a chronic pain disorder. This research objectives to determine whether mechanical back pain patients' pain severity and functional disabilities are influenced by electromagnetic field therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study aims to compare the effects of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and quadriceps muscle strengthening exercises using biofeedback on pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods: This randomized, two-group clinical trial included patients with KOA (grades II - III of the Lawrence Kellgren classification) who met the inclusion criteria. Written informed consent was obtained from participants before they were randomly allocated into one of two groups: HILT + therapeutic exercise (group A) or quadriceps muscle strengthening exercises using biofeedback + therapeutic exercise (group B).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-known consequence of neuraxial anesthesia that can impede patient recovery and delay early discharge. Traditional remedies include hydration and the administration of simple analgesics for symptom relief. When symptoms persist despite conservative interventions, an epidural blood patch (EBP) is typically recommended.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study compares the effects of transforaminal magnesium sulfate injection versus other methods for managing radicular back pain, highlighting its potential for improved pain relief and functional outcomes.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind clinical trial involved 30 patients with radicular back pain who were randomly assigned to receive either transforaminal magnesium sulfate or triamcinolone injection. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and functional disability, assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!