Background: Both minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have gained popularity in recent years. We conducted a qualitative and systematic review to assess the effectiveness of MIS, CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA.
Methods: An extensive computerised literature search of PubMed, Medline, Embase and OVIDSP was conducted. Both randomised clinical trials and controlled clinical trials on the effectiveness of MIS, CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA were included. Methodological quality was independently assessed by two reviewers. Effect estimates were calculated and a best-evidence synthesis was performed.
Results: Four high-quality and 14 medium-quality studies with MIS THA as study contrast, and three high-quality and four medium-quality studies with CAS THA as study contrast were included. No studies with computer-assisted MIS for THA as study contrast were identified. Strong evidence was found for a decrease in operative time and intraoperative blood loss for MIS THA, with no difference in complication rates and risk for acetabular outliers. Strong evidence exists that there is no difference in physical functioning, measured either by questionnaires or by gait analysis. Moderate evidence was found for a shorter length of hospital stay after MIS THA. Conflicting evidence was found for a positive effect of MIS THA on pain in the early postoperative period, but that effect diminished after three months postoperatively. Strong evidence was found for an increase in operative time for CAS THA, and limited evidence was found for a decrease in intraoperative blood loss. Furthermore, strong evidence was found for no difference in complication rates, as well as for a significantly lower risk for acetabular outliers.
Conclusions: The results indicate that MIS THA is a safe surgical procedure, without increases in operative time, blood loss, operative complication rates and component malposition rates. However, the beneficial effect of MIS THA on functional recovery has to be proven. The results also indicate that CAS THA, though resulting in an increase in operative time, may have a positive effect on operative blood loss and operative complication rates. More importantly, the use of CAS results in better positioning of acetabular component of the prosthesis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2879237 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-92 | DOI Listing |
J Orthop Traumatol
November 2024
Department for Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria.
J Arthroplasty
June 2023
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Sakyo-ku, Japan.
Background: Although introduction of minimally invasive techniques via anterolateral approaches considerably decreased prolonged limp after total hip arthroplasty (THA), potential damage to the abductor muscles is still a concern. This study aimed to evaluate the residual damage after primary THA with two types of anterolateral approach by assessing fatty infiltration and atrophy of the gluteus medius (GMed) and gluteus minimus (GMin) muscles.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 primary THAs using computed tomography; surgeries were performed by detaching the anterior part of the abductor muscles with a bone fragment (anterolateral approach with trochanteric flip osteotomy) or without it (anterolateral approach without trochanteric flip osteotomy).
JAMA Netw Open
January 2023
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Importance: Each approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a long learning curve, so a surgeon's choice to change their preferred approach needs to be guided by clear justifications. However, current evidence does not suggest that any of the THA approaches are more beneficial than others, and the choice of approach is mainly based on the knowledge and experience of the surgeon and individual patient characteristics.
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety associated with different surgical approaches for THA.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
August 2023
Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Introduction: Increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in minimally invasive (MIS) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still debated. This study aimed to identify differences in surgical and patient-related risk factors for PJI between an MIS anterolateral approach and transgluteal-modified Hardinge approach.
Methods: A retrospective cohort of 5315 THAs performed between 2006 and 2019 at a single institution was screened.
J Clin Med
December 2022
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 545-8585, Japan.
Currently, various minimally invasive surgical techniques are applied for total hip arthroplasty (THA). There are few studies comparing the early postoperative clinical outcomes of minimally invasive THA between anterolateral and posterolateral approaches. In this retrospective study, 62 patients underwent minimally invasive THA via either the anterolateral approach with an intermuscular exposure using the modified Watson-Jones approach (MIS-AL, 34 hips) or mini-incision THA with a posterolateral approach (MIS-PL, 28 hips).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!