Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Retained and recurrent bile duct stones can be treated with a variety of non-surgical methods. The list includes endoscopic papillotomy, chemical dissolution, by T-tube extraction, percutaneous or extracorporeal lithotripsy. The various attempts at non-surgical therapy are described in two patients with retained bile duct stones before biliary clearance was achieved by re-operation. The failure of oral dissolution using biliary acids, endoscopic papillotomy and by T-tube extraction, led to a delay of 6 and 8 months respectively in the elimination of the retained stones in each patient. Surgical re-exploration proved relatively simple due to the long interval after the first operation, and the stones were removed without particular difficulties. The paper underlines the importance of the choice of treatment for use in cases of secondary common bile duct calculi, evaluated on the basis of a correct assessment of the cost/benefit, risk/benefit ratios.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!