Instrumental investigations and migraine diagnosis.

Neurol Sci

Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Clinica Neurologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 1, 60020, Ancona, Italy.

Published: June 2010

Migraine diagnosis is based on clinical parameters. Before reaching a correct diagnosis, patients usually consult a large number of specialists and perform unhelpful exams. This represents a significant problem for an optimization of healthy resources. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the relationship between time interval from symptoms' onset to a correct diagnosis and number and type of clinical and instrumental investigations. We considered 180 consecutive patients referred to our Headache Center who obtained the first diagnosis of migraine without aura. Most patients were referred to our center by general practitioners (80%). Previously, about half of patients consulted a specialist not involved in migraine management. In 68% of cases, patients performed radiological and/or laboratory exams. Time from symptom onset to a correct diagnosis of migraine was less than 1 year in only 16.7% of the cases. In 83.3% of patients, the time delay overcame 1 year. In 53.3%, it reached 5 or more years. The time interval to obtain a correct diagnosis significantly influenced the number of specialists consulted and the number of radiological and laboratory investigations performed. Our findings confirm the presence of problems in migraine management. In particular, expensive and unnecessary visits and exams are very often prescribed. This inappropriate procedure could be easily counteracted by a correct application of diagnostic criteria for migraine.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-010-0313-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

correct diagnosis
16
diagnosis migraine
12
instrumental investigations
8
migraine diagnosis
8
number specialists
8
time interval
8
onset correct
8
patients referred
8
migraine management
8
migraine
7

Similar Publications

Background: Enhancing self-management in health care through digital tools is a promising strategy to empower patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to improve self-care.

Objective: This study evaluates whether the Greenhabit (mobile health [mHealth]) behavioral treatment enhances T2D outcomes compared with standard care.

Methods: A 12-week, parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 123 participants (62/123, 50%, female; mean age 58.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The medial epicanthal fold is a common ethnic trait in East Asian faces, and there is a significant demand for its correction for cosmetic reasons. Numerous epicanthoplasty techniques have been proposed; however, visible scarring and unnatural canthal shapes have been challenges. This study aimed to introduce a simpler approach for medial epicanthoplasty to address these issues and evaluate its outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It is estimated that 61% of deaths caused by Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs) globally are attributed to lifestyle-related risk factors including tobacco use, alcohol abuse, poor diet, and inadequate physical activity. Meanwhile, inadequate knowledge and misperceptions about CVDs are disproportionately increasing the prevalence of CVDs in Africa. Moreover, pre-diagnosis awareness/knowledge about CVDs among patients is essential in shaping the extent and scope of education to be provided by healthcare workers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to investigate knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward coronary heart disease (CHD) secondary prevention among CHD patients.

Methods: This web-based cross-sectional study enrolled patients with CHD who visited the Yangpu District Central Hospital in Shanghai (China) between October 18, 2022, and March 25, 2023. The administered questionnaire assessed demographic information and KAP; factors associated with good practice were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: This study analyzed the differences in the upper airway of patients with skeletal Class III high-angle malocclusion with and without mandibular deviation, and further investigated whether there are differences in the changes in upper airway space after orthognathic surgery between the two groups.

Materials And Methods: 15 patients with skeletal Class III high-angle malocclusion and mandibular deviation, and 15 patients without mandibular deviation were selected to explore the impact of mandibular deviation on the upper airway. Additionally, 16 patients with mandibular deviation undergoing orthodontic-orthognathic combined treatment, and 13 patients without mandibular deviation, were selected to investigate the differences in the changes in upper airway space after orthognathic surgery between the two groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!