Either of two related molybdenum-responsive regulators, MopA and MopB, of Rhodobacter capsulatus is sufficient to repress the nitrogen-fixation gene anfA. In contrast, MopA (but not MopB) activates mop, which codes for a molybdate (Mo)-binding molbindin. Both regulators bind to conserved cis-regulatory elements called Mo-boxes. Single-base substitution of two highly conserved nucleotides within the anfA-Mo-box (T21C and C24T) had little effect on regulator binding and anfA expression as shown by DNA mobility shift assays and reporter gene fusions, respectively. In contrast to C24T, mutation C24A strongly diminished binding and repression by MopA and MopB, showing that different nucleotide substitutions at the same position may have very different effects. A triple mutation destroying the left half-site of the mop-Mo-box completely abolished mop expression by MopA, demonstrating the importance of the mop-Mo-box for mop activation. Two point mutations (T23A and T24C) still allowed binding by MopA, but abolished mop activation, most likely because these nucleotides overlap with the RNA polymerase-binding site. A mutant mop promoter, in which the mop-Mo-box was exchanged against the anfA-Mo-box, allowed activation by MopA, showing that a former repressor-binding site may act as an activator-binding site depending on its location relative to the other promoter elements.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01981.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mopa mopb
16
molybdenum-responsive regulators
8
regulators mopa
8
mopb rhodobacter
8
rhodobacter capsulatus
8
abolished mop
8
mop activation
8
mopa
7
mop
5
relevance individual
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!