Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the preferences of general practitioners (GPs) in reply letters for patients referred for a one-off psychiatric assessment.
Method: A sample of GPs referring to a primary mental health team service were mailed a questionnaire inquiring into the usefulness of 21 different letter items.
Results: The response rate was 51%. Many of the items in our routine reply letters were rated highly, but others such as developmental history, supplementary information and a comprehensive report were not. Sending a copy of the letter to the patient was rated as useful by only 42.5%.
Conclusions: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists' guidelines for reply letters are endorsed. There are, however, some additional items that GPs may find useful.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10398560902971771 | DOI Listing |
N Engl J Med
January 2025
University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Liver Int
February 2025
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!