A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Repeated contrast cisternography after previous use of an oily contrast medium (author's transl)]. | LitMetric

Twenty-four control cisternograms were carried out at two to 22 months after lumbar injection of 1.0 to 1.5 ml. Duroliopaque; 20 of these were successfully performed without a fresh lumbar puncture. In most cases, the amount of contrast medium available was less than at the original examination, but was sufficient for definite exclusion of a space-occupying lesion. In four cases only the contrast medium could not be mobilised or manoeuvred into the cisterns and a fresh lumbar puncture was required for further contrast injection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1230820DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contrast medium
12
fresh lumbar
8
lumbar puncture
8
[repeated contrast
4
contrast cisternography
4
cisternography previous
4
previous oily
4
contrast
4
oily contrast
4
medium author's
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!